GJØR INTERNETT SEMINARROMMET OVERFLØDIG?

24 okt

lecture hall

I går startet BI et stort etterutdanningsprogram i prosjektledelse for Aibel AS , -som er en stor leverandør av tjenester til olje- og gassindustrien. 

Programmet har mange spennende sider, men jeg vil særlig trekke frem pedagogikken, som er basert på såkalt "blended learning". Det spennende med denne pedagogikken er at den baserer seg på å kombinere læring via internett, med læring i klasserommet. Jeg føler meg sikker på at dette er fremtiden.

Det er vanlig å se på internett som noe som fortrenger tradisjonelle læringsformer, og gjør ansikt til ansikt - kontakt (F2F) i seminar- og klasserom overflødig.  Det mener jeg er feil. Riktignok kan internett bidra med mye. Men det er noe med direkte kommunikasjon mellom folk som fanger opp en helhet og en intuisjon som nettet går glipp av. IT - fanatikere mener det bare er et spørsmål om tid før teknologien greier å fange opp også dette, og anbefaler oss som er trent i mer tradisjonell klasse- og seminarromspedagogikk om å søke omskolering like godt med en gang..
Ingen av oss kan riktignok være sikre på hva fremtiden bringer, men personlig mener jeg det er lite som tyder på at behovet for F2F vil forsvinne i pedagogikken. Intuitiv kommunikasjon er stikkordet. Den krever at alle sanser er i bruk samtidig!

Mye tyder derfor på at "blended learning" er svaret på hvordan internett og mer tradisjonell læring kan kombineres. På BI gleder vi oss til å være med å videreutvikle dette sammen med en så oppegående bedrift som Aibel!

Del denne siden:

Kommentarer

    • Thank you for mentioning us in your blog. At Aibel we are very concerned that all employees have the opportunity to learn more, grow and develop. This benefits the employees just as much as it benefits the level of knowledge and the growth in the company.
      For us, I think this is not a new thing, being a large oil service company with offices and yards in eight locations in Norway and five internationally, we need Internet communication to get the work done. Smooth processes, less travelling, ability to detailed explanations in video/internet meetings is essential.
      Coming from the academic sector myself, (UiS for 11 years) I must agree with the IT fanatics, whom I do not think are fanatic at all. Everybody needs to think new, adept to new techniques, both for learning, teaching and collaboration. The universities, who first use learning techniques also used in the work environment, will gain on this.

    • Ingeborg Dirdal, social media geek/communication advisor, aibel.com
    • (24 oktober 2011 12:41)
    • There are some similarities between a classroom and a meeting room. Indeed, at our company we have sucessfully used Videoconferencing for some time, but these virtual meetings tend to enhance Conference-calls rather than replace meetings. The tech vizards are right: Current drawbacks of videoconferences including poor video and lighting, insufficient response-time, impossibility of having various interventions simultaneously, will disappear as technology improves. Current drawbacks however, contribute to limit the interactions and spontaneousness of videoconferencing, as it would for a teacher having a virtuall class.

      So yes, "Rektor" is right: technology is helping us to enrich learning, as it intends to, but does not replace it.

    • Arne Blom
    • (26 oktober 2011 11:11)
    • I agree with you. There is that personal touch that the classroom teaching offers that the internet cannot provide. That touch that traditional learning offers in the classroom makes learning more effective and this cannot be replaced by the internet.

    • Sharleen
    • (29 oktober 2011 13:28)
    • Thanks for the comments on my latest blogg. Your comments strengthen my view that nes technology will bring a more diversified learning environment, making it more challenging, but also more rewarding, to be a teacher!

      Ingeborg does not seem to like my expression "IT fanatics", who she does not think are fanatics at all!
      Well, I have to disagree on that, and let me elaborate a bit on what I mean with the expression.

      Some people become so seduced by the technology itself that they do not take time to check the sosial relevance of the latest technological innovations, before they spend all their money on useless stuff, or, if they are business people, bring into the market technological fetishes that find no customers. On the other hand, I do not intend to be too critical: If we are to make technolgical progress that are socially relevant, we must also allow some
      innovations to fail. So the IT fanatics may have an important social function to fulfill, after all!

    • Tom Colbjørnsen
    • (30 oktober 2011 21:06)