FJERN SKYLAPPENE!

30 mai

BI forbindes vanligvis med markedsøkonomi og private bedrifter.  Det setter vi pris på, for svært mye av vår utdanningsvirksomhet og forskning er rettet inn mot denne virksomheten. De fleste av våre studenter retter seg også inn mot karrierer i private virksomheter.  Hva med offentlig sektor? 

Noen har den feilaktige oppfatningen at innsikter som er ervervet gjennom studier av bedrifter og markeder ikke bare er lite relevante for offentlig sektor, men til og med direkte skadelig å anvende der. Det ideologiske stikkordet som får noen til å trekke ned rullgardinen er ”New Public Management”, en fellesbetegnelse som oppstod på 1980 og - 90 – tallet, og som enkelt fortalt tok sikte på å effektivisere offentlig sektor gjennom mer bruk av markedsstyring, og organisasjons- og ledelsesmodeller fra private bedrifter. Skepsisen var ikke helt ubegrunnet. Blant annet viste en undersøkelse at halvparten av de konsulentene som jobbet mot offentlig sektor på 1980- og 90 – tallet ønsket å gjøre det offentlige mest mulig lik flyselskapet SAS!) For unge lesere: SAS ble på den tiden, under sin karismatiske leder Janne Carlzon, av mange holdt fram som et forbilde for fremtidens organisasjon og ledelse!) En del ekstreme anvendelser av tankegangen ga lite vellykkede resultater, blant annet på New Zealand.

Etter det har betennelsen New Public Management fått en retorisk kraft som noen bruker til å stoppe enhver konstruktiv debatt om bruk av BI – fag på offentlig sektor.  Det er kjedelig, for BIs fag og kompetanse er ikke knyttet til en spesiell løsning, eller et fast knippe av teorier. For eksempel underviser BIs folk ledelse på forskjellig måte når vi i rederiet Wilhelmsen, og når vi er i Oslo – skolene.  I en setning er det som er felles for BIs tilnærming å finne løsninger som gir mest mulig velferd igjen for pengene. Formålet er å unngå å sløse med ressurser, enten det er kompetanse eller andre ting! Det er noe offentlig sektor fortsatt vil ha nytte av, etter hvert som knappheten på ressurser, blant annet arbeidskraft, tiltar. Og det er noe som på BI også har nytte av, for vi har mye igjen for de erfaringene vi tar med oss fra offentlig sektor i vår egen faglige utvikling. 

Billig retorikk knyttet til New Public Management bør ikke få komme i veien for dette.

People with blinkers

Del denne siden:

Kommentarer

    • Doesn't your school's name change from BI Norwegian School of Management to Norwegian Business School suggest that you are actually moving away from the public not-for-profit sector?

    • Fred
    • (30 mai 2011 13:37)
    • Well, concerning your last paragraph, when you say: "The public sector will still benefit from this as the scarcity of resources, for instance labour power, is gradually increasing. And this is something BI can also benefit from, because we learn a lot from the experiences we make in the public sector that is important to our academic development. "

      I would say it's not the only thing BI can learn from the public sector. Moreover, BI's students would benefit a great deal by learning more about new ways of thinking about the economy. "News forms of capitalism", as Professor Porter likes to call it. I would rather call it "New ways of understanding Social Economics", though, which is the same but the source of the credits go to the opposite side.

      We learn so much about how capitalism is so good for development of nations, but so little about how creating more egalitarian and prosper societies by using what we have learnt at BI. It is right that we can use everything we learn at BI in both the private and public sector, but we cannot say that there is anything in the public/social-economic sector that it has been taught to us. The problem with that is that we are guys who see only with one eye, and even worse, an eye which has been hit so hard so many times!

      I look forward to the day when BI opens up to teach more economics, implementing an Economics specialization for example. That would help BI to go a step forward and not only teach how to speculate on stock prices, but also how to help to create better societies by implementing the right economic policies, together with a new way of thinking about business ethics.

    • Hernan Aros
    • (01 juni 2011 13:27)
    • Thanks to Fred and Herman for responding to my latest blogg on New Public Management. My main point in that blogg was that
      BI and the public sector both would benefit from more interaction.

      First to Fred. You ask if BI's name change from BI Norwegian School of Mangement to BI Norwegin Business School
      reflects that BI is actually moving away from the public sector. In one way you are right. The name change signals that our
      strategy is to become an even more consistent learning partner for the business community. However, business and
      government is not two isolated worlds. Of course, there are differences. Business has more emphasis on efficiency and innovation,
      while government is more concerned with social and political legitimacy. However, and that is my main point: Government would benefit
      from becoming both more efficient and innovative, while firms needs to put more emphasis on running their business in ways that
      do not provoke societal values. We could learn from each other.
      Then to Herman: You would like to learn more about alternatives to capitalism, and have more options for studying Economics.
      As a business school we have to give top priority to prepare our students for jobs in the economic system we are actually living in. We do, however,
      try to inspire our students to critical thinking by also presenting alternative approaches, for example in the obligatory course "The Firm"
      that all bachelor students have to attend to. And as you may have observed, in BI's new strategy, Economics is one of the six diciplines that
      will be given high priority in the future. One especially promising tendency is for Finance and Economics to be lectured together.

    • Tom Colbjørnsen
    • (03 juni 2011 09:47)
    • The fact that you have in mind lecturing Economics and Finance together is great news. Probably not many people think like me, but I consider that, without economics, finance very much lacks sense in terms of what its main objective should be. From my point of view, this is providing tools for fostering financial efficiency for the private and public sector; and by doing this, accomplishing a more profound mission than just maximizing profits, which is helping to create better and more satisfied societies.

      Up to now, we basically learn how market manipulators and gamblers work in a no-sense financial system, which is auto-destructive and unethical. As well as how to do it to protect these gamblers from losing huge amounts of money. There is no doubts all this theory is important, it's just the way it's used what it's wrong; and so putting so much focus to it appears as a rather not so justifiable idea.

      I understand BI tries to educate people useful for the system, but I would also expect BI focusing on creating more open-minded professionals, who can generate change in a system which has much to explain to millions starving around the world. Do you want BI to be the leader? then create leaders and not followers of other's ideas.

      I agree with you that the public sector has much to learn about efficiency from privates, but it is also true that the private sector has a lot to learn from the public sector. Especially when it comes to answer questions regarding the main purpose of businesses. As Porter says, "the focus must be changed from what is good for businesses is good for society into what is good for societies is good for businesses"; and that change in approach must start at the business schools, in this case at BI.

      I must say that for me is a bit surprising that a person with your sociological background, puts so much focus on the private sector and so little into what we can learn from other forms of economical structures, rather than capitalism. I might be wrong on this, but that has been my experience at BI during these 3 years of Bachelor.

      PS: Please excuse my ignorance if some of the things I say here are not totally accurate or you have taken care of it already. I just talk from my point of view and my experience at BI, considering the lectures I've had.

    • Hernan Aros
    • (03 juni 2011 22:35)
    • How moral is it to create and pereptuate a welfare state where individuals are dependent upon a state that is dependent upon other people's money? Build a population with no self-esteem, sense of accountability or personal responsibility, weak and malleable of mind and spirit.It's definitely a moral issue, and they prove they have none.

    • Alex
    • (08 mars 2012 06:22)