Vegard Vinje

Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 21(1) Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-024-00582-0

Background Infusion testing is an established method for assessing CSF resistance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). To what extent the increased resistance is related to the glymphatic system is an open question. Here we introduce a computational model that includes the glymphatic system and enables us to determine the importance of (1) brain geometry, (2) intracranial pressure, and (3) physiological parameters on the outcome of and response to an infusion test. Methods We implemented a seven-compartment multiple network porous medium model with subject specific geometries from MR images using the finite element library FEniCS. The model consists of the arterial, capillary and venous blood vessels, their corresponding perivascular spaces, and the extracellular space (ECS). Both subject specific brain geometries and subject specific infusion tests were used in the modeling of both healthy adults and iNPH patients. Furthermore, we performed a systematic study of the effect of variations in model parameters. Results Both the iNPH group and the control group reached a similar steady state solution when subject specific geometries under identical boundary conditions was used in simulation. The difference in terms of average fluid pressure and velocity between the iNPH and control groups, was found to be less than 6% during all stages of infusion in all compartments. With subject specific boundary conditions, the largest computed difference was a 75% greater fluid speed in the arterial perivascular space (PVS) in the iNPH group compared to the control group. Changes to material parameters changed fluid speeds by several orders of magnitude in some scenarios. A considerable amount of the CSF pass through the glymphatic pathway in our models during infusion, i.e., 28% and 38% in the healthy and iNPH patients, respectively. Conclusions Using computational models, we have found the relative importance of subject specific geometries to be less important than individual differences in resistance as measured with infusion tests and model parameters such as permeability, in determining the computed pressure and flow during infusion. Model parameters are uncertain, but certain variations have large impact on the simulation results. The computations resulted in a considerable amount of the infused volume passing through the brain either through the perivascular spaces or the extracellular space.

Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 20 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-023-00459-8

SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 61(3) p. 1449-1481 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/21m1449695

PLOS ONE 18(3) Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280501

Fluids and Barriers of the CNS 19:84 p. 1-17 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00376-2

Background Today’s availability of medical imaging and computational resources set the scene for high-fidelity computational modelling of brain biomechanics. The brain and its environment feature a dynamic and complex interplay between the tissue, blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF). Here, we design a computational platform for modelling and simulation of intracranial dynamics, and assess the models’ validity in terms of clinically relevant indicators of brain pulsatility. Focusing on the dynamic interaction between tissue motion and ISF/CSF flow, we treat the pulsatile cerebral blood flow as a prescribed input of the model. Methods We develop finite element models of cardiac-induced fully coupled pulsatile CSF flow and tissue motion in the human brain environment. The three-dimensional model geometry is derived from magnetic resonance images (MRI) and features a high level of detail including the brain tissue, the ventricular system, and the cranial subarachnoid space (SAS). We model the brain parenchyma at the organ-scale as an elastic medium permeated by an extracellular fluid network and describe flow of CSF in the SAS and ventricles as viscous fluid movement. Representing vascular expansion during the cardiac cycle, a prescribed pulsatile net blood flow distributed over the brain parenchyma acts as the driver of motion. Additionally, we investigate the effect of model variations on a set of clinically relevant quantities of interest. Results Our model predicts a complex interplay between the CSF-filled spaces and poroelastic parenchyma in terms of ICP, CSF flow, and parenchymal displacements. Variations in the ICP are dominated by their temporal amplitude, but with small spatial variations in both the CSF-filled spaces and the parenchyma. Induced by ICP differences, we find substantial ventricular and cranial-spinal CSF flow, some flow in the cranial SAS, and small pulsatile ISF velocities in the brain parenchyma. Moreover, the model predicts a funnel-shaped deformation of parenchymal tissue in dorsal direction at the beginning of the cardiac cycle. Conclusions Our model accurately depicts the complex interplay of ICP, CSF flow and brain tissue movement and is well-aligned with clinical observations. It offers a qualitative and quantitative platform for detailed investigation of coupled intracranial dynamics and interplay, both under physiological and pathophysiological conditions.