Jonas R. Kunst
Professor
Department of Communication and Culture
Professor
Department of Communication and Culture
Article Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Dinh Hung Vu, Rongtian Tong, Mike W.-L. Cheung, Nora Cornelia Glerud Benningstad, Evita Willemiek van Duin, Karine Lindholm, Colleen Ward, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Abstract International migration has been consistently rising in modern times, and understanding what factors are associated with the successful inclusion of migrants is urgent. This meta-analysis helps pinpoint such factors by identifying the most robust social and contextual correlates of successful migrant adaptation to living in the receiving societies. Here, we meta-analyze 5,066 effects from 1,114 primary studies among 571,260 first-generation migrants, international students, business expatriates, and refugees. We show that migrant adaptation is most strongly negatively associated with the presence of stressors, especially acculturative stressors and perceived discrimination, and positively with the availability of social resources, especially feelings of connectedness with the social context and not feeling lonely. The role of variables related to culture learning, namely exposure to social groups within the new culture, and the distance between the new culture and one’s heritage culture, was more limited. This pattern was found across the different migrant groups.
Article Gunhild Nyborg, Arne Vasli Lund Søraas, Sofie Buer, Anders Benteson Nygaard, Jonas R. Kunst (2024)
En overveldende mengde forskning viser at long covid er en multi-organ, systemisk sykdom. Mind-Body ReprogrammeringsTerapi alene kan neppe …
Article Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Mikey Biddlestone, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Prior research suggests that people who believe in and spread conspiracy theories are often viewed negatively, yet investigations systematically disentangling both factors are scarce. The present research addressed this gap through two pre-registered experiments with representative samples from the U.S. In Study 1, 418 participants evaluated eight fictional individuals across 3,344 trials, presented as (a) believing in and/or (b) spreading conspiracy theories in a 2 x 2 within-subjects design. Analyses revealed that both characters who believed in conspiracy theories and those who spread them were perceived as less competent, moral, and warm, and as more narcissistic, Machiavellian, and psychopathic. Moreover, both believers and spreaders were perceived as likely to engage in conspiratorial actions themselves, and participants reported lower willingness to interact with them. However, significant interactions for all variables showed that these effects were particularly pronounced for characters who spread conspiracy theories without believing in them. Notably, participants’ own conspiracy beliefs and to some extent their right-wing political orientation attenuated several effects and reversed some. In Study 2, we employed the reverse-correlation technique to model 412 participants’ mental representations of individuals who varied in belief and/or spread of conspiracy theories using a 2 x 2 between-subjects design. Results were directionally consistent with Study 1—both believers and spreaders of conspiracy theories were mentally represented less favorably—but no interactions or moderations were observed. Moreover, believing had significantly stronger effects than spreading on the rating dimensions. We discuss the social implications of these results and outline future directions.
Article Tuuli Anna Renvik, Viivi Eskelinen, Teemu Pauha, Jolanda Jetten, Jonas R. Kunst, Jolanda van der Noll, Anette Rohmann, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti (2025)
Article Ann-Cathrin Coenen, Felix J. Feist, Roland Imhoff, Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Social scientists have developed impactful frameworks to understand who unites in protest. Yet, when exceptional circumstances arise, people are sometimes astounded by the convergence of disparate groups protesting together for an apparently unifying cause. One recent example is the COVID‐19 pandemic. A new movement protesting the containment measures rapidly evolved, gaining momentum only weeks after the measures' implementation. Strikingly, the movement included participants from, among others, the political far left and right—individuals who had protested each other only weeks earlier and would do so again after the pandemic was declared over. This context enabled a real‐life investigation of how people navigated conflicting ideologies to mobilise collectively. Drawing on 11 naturalistic protest observations and template analysis of 30 interviews with 31 protesters, we find that most participants indeed experienced the movement as ideologically diverse. At the same time, protesters used three strategies to navigate ideological conflict: (1) highlighting superordinate identities and ally utility (i.e., usefulness in advancing shared goals); (2) defending allies through in−/out‐group biases; and (3) embracing diversity. Our analysis demonstrates the combined explanatory power of social identity, social categorisation, and coalitional psychology frameworks in understanding emerging Querfront alliances, showing how protesters moved from identity construction to coalition calculus.
Article Shlomo Black, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Article Samantha M. Harris, Hege H. Bye, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Academic book Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Article Simon Ozer, Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Article Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Chapter Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst, Kledian Myftari (2025)
Article Piksa Michal, Zaniewska Magdalena, Cieslik-Starkiewicz Agata, Jonas R. Kunst, Morzy Mikolaj, Piasecki Jan, Rygula Rafal (2025)
Article Xiaoyu Zhou, Alexander Scott English, Liuqing Wei, Ananta Yudiarso, Arobindu Dash, Arun Tipandjan, Ashley Biddle, Benjamin H. Nam, Chinun Boonroungrut, Cicilia Chettiar, ... (2025) Paolini Daniele, Dmitrii Dubrov, Dmitry Grigoryev, Dušana Šakan, Eliza Oliver, Elma Medosevic - Korjenic, Adolfo Fabricio Licoa Campos, Felipe Novaes, Fridanna Maricchiolo, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Hacer Belen, Hendrik Gunawan, Huang Jiang, Joep Hofhuis, Jonas R. Kunst, Joonha Park, Jose Candido Pereira Neto, Kaiyue Huang, Katharina Addington-Lefringhausen, Kazi Nur Hossain, Laura Martínez-Buelvas, Mahdi Yousefi, Masaki Yuki, Mehrdad F. Falavarjani, Miriam Schwarzenthal, Monika Klimek-Tulwin, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, Nicolas Geeraert, Nuannut Khieowan, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit, Qian Sun, Richard G. Cowden, Rita Castro, Robert Thomson, Rongtian Tong, Sadia Malik, Samuel Lins, Sanja Batić Očovaj, Shuang Wang, Sibele D. Aquino, Steve Kulich, Tahir Farid, Tales Alves, Thomas Talhelm, Veljko Jovanović, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Xiaoyuan Li, Xinyi Zhang (2025) Show all contributors
Chapter Aino Lilja Petterson, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Article Joshua M. Ackerman, Theodore Samore, Daniel M.T. Fessler, Tom R. Kupfer, Soyeon Choi, Wilson N. Merrell, Lene Aarøe, Toivo Aavik, Stephen Acabado, Grace Akello, ... (2025) Ilham N. Alfian, Laith Al-Shawaf, Marinés M. Alvarez, Jeanine Ammann, Gizem Arikan, Saiyeda A. Asha, Anibal M. Astobiza, Carmen G. Baeza-Ugarte, Pat Barclay, Fiona Kate Barlow, Lisiane Bizarro, Paola Bressan, Andres Castellanos-Chacón, Bryan K.C. Choy, Achmad Chusairi, Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Brenda L. Chávez Cosamalón, Bernardo Costa-Neves, Mallika De, Tiago J.S. de Lima, Piyanjali de Zoysa, Ieva Dryžaitė, Christian T. Elbæk, Peter Fedor, Ana M. Fernández, Regina Fernandez-Morales, Márta Fülöp, Vladimer Lado Gamsakhurdia, Leonor Garcia-Gómez, Leonel Garcia-Marques, Jimena Garduño-Franco, María del Pilar Grazioso, Fanny Habacht, Youssef Hasan, Camila P. Haugestad, Christian Andres Palacios Haugestad, Jan Havlíček, Earl J. Hernandez, Vu M. Hoang, Minsung Hong, Ivana Hromatko, Dzintra Iliško, Hirotaka Imada, Ivana Jakšić, Tomasz Jarmakowski, Harpa L. Hjördísar Jónsdóttir, Kotrina Kajokaite, Šárka Kaňková, Nicolas Kervyn, Jinseok P. Kim, Jonas R. Kunst, Michael Laakasuo, Juan David Leongómez, Norman P. Li, Junsong Lu, Nathan Lynch, María A. Maegli, Harry Manley, Gabriela Marcu, Thea McAfee, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Nándor B. Molnár, Coby Morvinski, Haslina Muhamad, Pegah Nejat, Hoang Nguyen Huy, Angelica N. Oliveira, Mats J. Olsson, Charity N. Onyishi, Ike E. Onyishi, Reegan Orozco, Tobias Otterbring, Ida Strande Ottersen, Gustavo Pacheco-López, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Walter Paniagua, Roksana Parvin, Zoran Pavlović, Pavol Prokop, Emma Raffman, Muhammad Rizwan, Sheila Rojas, Joanna Różycka-Tran, Oscar R. Sánchez, Heyla Selim, Barış Sevi, Yaniv Shani, Madhulika S. Shastry, Stefan Stieger, Eunkook M. Suh, Melati Sumari, Kosuke Takemura, Arnaud Tognetti, Roberta Z.R. Trombetta, Joshua M. Tybur, Eylul B. Ucak, Yukiko Uchida, Jaroslava V. Valentova, Hugo Viciana, Amandine Visine, Jin Wang, XT (XiaoTian) Wang, Illia I. Yahiiaiev, Rizqy A. Zein, Iris Žeželj (2025) Show all contributors
Chapter Aino Lilja Petterson, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Kinga Bierwiaczonek (2025)
Conspiracy theories have the capacity to evoke intense emotions that can serve as catalysts for behavioral propensities, even those of the most extreme nature (Bierwiaczonek et al., 2024), underscoring the paramount importance of a psychological understanding of this intricate process. While a number of studies have investigated the role of emotions in this context (e.g., Prooijen, 2022; van Prooijen et al., 2022; Wabnegger et al., 2024), a comprehensive framework to elucidate how different conspiracy theories elicit distinct emotions based on their appraisal has been notably absent. This lacuna in the literature makes the contribution by Pummerer et al. (2024) all the more invaluable and timely. In their review, the authors put forward the Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT) to understand the diverse emotional and behavioral consequences of conspiracy beliefs. The model posits that different features of conspiracy theories, when made salient, elicit specific combinations of appraisals related to certainty, control, and pleasantness. These appraisal patterns are thought to be associated with distinct emotions such as fear, anger, disgust, pride, and schadenfreude, which in turn are connected to different action tendencies ranging from withdrawal, confrontation, aggression aimed at exclusion, to community-building. The model can be considered a seminal contribution to the field and generates many testable hypotheses for future research.
Chapter Nora Cornelia Glerud Benningstad, Andreas Miles-Novelo, Jonas R. Kunst, Milan Obaidi, Craig A. Anderson (2025)
Article Silvia Allegretta, Margarita Gavrilova, Natalia Kartushina, Julien Mayor, Maja Roch, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Article Curtis Edward Philis, Jeremy K. Miller, Erin M. Buchanan, Amanda Williams, Chanel Meyers, Elizabeth R. Brown, Gerit Pfuhl, Sarah E. Martiny, Kristoffer Klevjer, Frederike S. Woelfert, ... (2025) Jonas R. Kunst, Christian Krog Tamnes, Max Korbmacher, Pablo Cesar de Juan Bernabeu, Janis Heinrich Zickfeld, Selina Volsa, Stefan Stieger, Elisabeth Oberzaucher, Vinka Mlakic, Martin Vasilev, İlker Dalgar, Sami Çoksan, Sinem Söylemez, Çağlar Solak, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Belemir Çoktok, Chun-Chia Kung, Panita Suavansri, Harry Manley, Sara Álvarez-Solas, Danilo Zambrano Ricaurte, Ivan Ropovik, Gabriel Baník, Peter Babinčák, Matúš Adamkovič, Pavol Kačmár, Monika Hricová, Jozef Bavoľár, Lisa Li, Fei Gao, Zhong Chen, Vanja Ković, Vasilije Gvozdenović, Patrícia Arriaga, Katarzyna Filip, Krystian Barzykowski, Sylwia Adamus, Margaret Messiah Singh, Sraddha Pradhan, Noorshama Parveen (2025) Show all contributors
Previous research has studied the extent to which men are the default members of social groups in terms of memory, categorization, and stereotyping, but not attitudes which is critical because of attitudes’ relationship to behavior. Results from our survey (N > 5000) collected via a globally distributed laboratory network in over 40 regions demonstrated that attitudes toward Black people and politicians had a stronger relationship with attitudes toward the men rather than the women of the group. However, attitudes toward White people had a stronger relationship with attitudes toward White women than White men, whereas attitudes toward East Asian people, police officers, and criminals did not have a stronger relationship with attitudes toward either the men or women of each respective group. Regional agreement with traditional gender roles was explored as a potential moderator. These findings have implications for understanding the unique forms of prejudice women face around the world.
Chapter Jonas R. Kunst, Milan Obaidi (2025)
Chapter D Osborn, Kieren J. Lilly, Jonas R. Kunst, Milan Obaidi, Kees van den Bos (2025)
Article Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø, Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Olav Vassend, Espen Røysamb, Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal, Jonas R. Kunst, Eivind Ystrøm, Lotte Thomsen (2024)
Objective: Political attitudes are predicted by the key ideological variables of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO), as well as some of the Big Five personality traits. Past research indicates that personality and ideological traits are correlated for genetic reasons. A question that has yet to be tested concerns whether the genetic variation underlying the ideological traits of RWA and SDO has distinct contributions to political attitudes, or if genetic variation in political attitudes is subsumed under the genetic variation underlying standard Big Five personality traits. Method: We use data from a sample of 1987 Norwegian twins to assess the genetic and environmental relationships between the Big Five personality traits, RWA, SDO, and their separate contributions to political policy attitudes. Results: RWA and SDO exhibit very high genetic correlation (r = 0.78) with each other and some genetic overlap with the personality traits of openness and agreeableness. Importantly, they share a larger genetic substrate with political attitudes (e.g., deporting an ethnic minority) than do Big Five personality traits, a relationship that persists even when controlling for the genetic foundations underlying personality traits. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the genetic foundations of ideological traits and political attitudes are largely non-overlapping with the genetic foundations of Big Five personality traits.
Editorial Jonas R. Kunst, Katharina Lefringhausen (2024)
Article Michal Piksa, Karolina Noworyta, Jan Piasecki, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst, Mikolaj Morzy, Rafal Rygula (2024)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Alex Mesoudi (2024)
Article Maor Shani, Jonas R. Kunst, Gulnaz Anjum, Milan Obaidi, Oded Adomi Leshem, Roman Antonovsky, Maarten van Zalk, Eran Halperin (2024)
Article Ann-Cathrin Coenen, Marilena Juttemeier, Milan Obaidi, Seamus A. Power, Jonas R. Kunst (2024)
Although the importance of temporal perspectives for understanding collective movements has been theoretically emphasised, they are rarely considered in research. Focusing on the mass protests against COVID-19 policies in Germany, we investigated how protesters make use of temporal references in their protest narratives. Results from 11 multi-site protest observations and 31 interviews showed that participants (a) drew historical perpetrator and victim analogies and imagined a dystopian future, bolstering perceptions of injustice, (b) drew on resistance narratives and imagined the ideal, utopian future society, increasing their perceived efficacy and (c) countered feelings of insignificance by identifying with past heroes. Protesters living in the East of Germany drew comparatively more resistance analogies than those living in the West, who often likened those complying with the COVID-19 policies to the perpetrators of the past national-socialist and communist dictatorships. The findings empirically underline the importance of integrating historical–cultural–future perspectives into models of collective action.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Katharina Lefringhausen, Hanna Zagefka (2024)
Article Michal Piksa, Karolina Noworyta, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst, Mikolaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula (2024)
Article Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Sander van der Linden, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula, Karolina Noworyta, Jonas R. Kunst (2024)
Article Nora Cornelia Glerud Benningstad, Hank Rothgerber, Jonas R. Kunst (2024)
Many individuals like eating meat but condemn causing harm to animals. Dissociating meat from its animal origins is one way to avoid the cognitive dissonance this ‘meat paradox’ elicits. While the significance of meat-animal dissociation for meat consumption is well-established, a recent literature review suggested that it consists of two distinct tendencies. First, people may differ in the degree to which they passively disassociate meat from its animal origins. Second, they may differ in the extent to which they actively dissociate to decrease dissonance. By developing and validating a scale in three pre-registered studies using samples of American and British meat-eaters, the present investigation aimed to quantitatively establish whether these two proposed tendencies constitute distinct constructs with different relations to dietary preferences, meat-related cognition, and affect. Study 1 (n = 300) provided initial support for a normally-distributed scale with two orthogonal dimensions that were systematically and differently related to a range of individual differences and dietary preferences. In Study 2 (n = 628), both dimensions were non-responsive to short-term cues that highlight the animal-meat link but predicted dietary preferences independent of them. Finally, Study 3 (n = 231) showed that the dissociation dimensions predict dietary preferences even in people working in the meat industry who have long-term exposure to cues that connect meat with its animal origins. Together, the results of the three studies supported the notion that people’s dissociation tendencies can be divided into two qualitatively distinct tendencies. Implications and avenues for future research are discussed.
Article Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø, Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski, Olav Mandt Vassend, Espen Røysamb, Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Eivind Ystrøm, Jonas R. Kunst, Line Cecilie Gjerde, Lotte Thomsen (2024)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Milan Obaidi, Sam Fluit, Tilmann von Soest, DAVID SAM, John F. Dovidio (2024)
Psychological research has begun considering the dynamics involved in majority-group acculturation, which is the extent to which cultural majority groups adopt the culture of immigrants and minority groups. However, previous research has predominantly concentrated on reactions to ‘immigrants’ or ‘minority groups’ as a homogenous entity, overlooking the nuanced perceptions and varied valuations attributed to different groups. Recognizing the heterogeneity among immigrant and minority groups, the present work investigated the influence of several perceived characteristics of immigrant and minority groups on majority-group members' adoption of their cultures. Specifically, in three pre-registered studies—one correlational (Nparticipants = 201, Ntrials = 2814) and two within-subjects experimental (Nparticipants = 144 and 146, Ntrials = 720 and 730) designs with close to politically representative samples from the U.K. and U.S. —majority-group members were more willing to adopt immigrant and minority-group cultures that they perceived as warm, competent and moral because these perceptions made immigrants and minority groups seem indispensable to the identity and economy of the mainstream society. Our studies highlight the importance of considering the differentiated acculturation that majority-group members have to various groups within the same national context. We discuss the societal and cultural repercussions of this selective uptake of other cultures.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Izabela Krysińska, Jan Piasecki, Tomi Wójtowicz, Rafal Rygula, Sander van der Linden, Mikolaj Morzy (2024)
Article Xiaoyu Zhou, Alexander Scott English, Steve J. Kulich, Lu Zheng, Tales Alves, Sibele D. Aquino, Sanja Batić Očovaj, Hacer Belen, Ashley Biddle, Chinun Boonroungrut, ... (2024) Adolfo Fabricio Licoa Campos, Rita Castro, Cicilia Chettiar, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit, Richard G. Cowden, Dmitrii Dubrov, Mehrdad F. Falavarjani, Tahir Farid, Nicolas Geeraert, Dmitry Grigoryev, Hendrik Gunawan, Joep Hofhuis, Kazi Nur Hossain, Kaiyue Huang, Huang Jiang, Veljko Jovanović, Nuannut Khieowan, Monika Klimek-Tulwin, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, Jonas R. Kunst, Katharina Lefringhausen, Xiaoyuan Li, Samuel Lins, Sadia Malik, Fridanna Maricchiolo, Laura Martínez-Buelvas, Elma Medosevic - Korjenic, Benjamin H. Nam, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Jose Candido Pereira Neto, Felipe Novaes, Eliza Oliver, Daniele Paolini, Joonha Park, Dušana Šakan, Miriam Schwarzenthal, Qian Sun, Thomas Talhelm, Robert Thomson, Arun Tipandjan, Rongtian Tong, Jorge Torres-Marín, Shuang Wang, Liuqing Wei, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Mahdi Yousefi, Ananta Yudiarso, Masaki Yuki, Xinyi Zhang (2024) Show all contributors
Article Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Sam Fluit, Tilmann von Soest, Matthew J. Hornsey, Jonas R. Kunst (2024)
Article Elif G. Ikizer, Ronald Fischer, Jonas R. Kunst, John F. Dovidio (2024)
Article Shlomo Black, Gabriel Horenczyk, Jonas R. Kunst (2024)
Article Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Mike W.-L. Cheung, Jonas R. Kunst (2023)
Article Erin M. Buchanan, Savannah C. Lewis, Bastien Paris, Patrick S. Forscher, Jeffrey M. Pavlacic, Julie E. Beshears, Shira Meir Drexler, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Peter R. Mallik, Miguel Alejandro A Silan, ... (2023) Jeremy K. Miller, Hans IJzerman, Hannah Moshontz, Jennifer L. Beaudry, Jordan W. Suchow, Christopher R. Chartier, Nicholas A. Coles, MohammadHasan Sharifian, Anna Louise Todsen, Carmel A. Levitan, Flávio Azevedo, Nicole Legate, Blake Heller, Alexander J. Rothman, Charles A. Dorison, Brian P. Gill, Ke Wang, Vaughan W. Rees, Nancy Gibbs, Amit Goldenberg, Thuy-Vy Thi Nguyen, James J. Gross, Gwenaêl Kaminski, Claudia C. von Bastian, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Farnaz Mosannenzadeh, Soufian Azouaghe, Alexandre Bran, Susana Ruiz-Fernandez, Anabela Caetano Santos, Niv Reggev, Janis Heinrich Zickfeld, Handan Akkas, Myrto Pantazi, Ivan Ropovik, Max Korbmacher, Patrícia Arriaga, Biljana Gjoneska, Lara Warmelink, Sara G. Alves, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Stefan Stieger, Vidar Schei, Paul H P Hanel, Barnabas Szaszi, Maksim Fedotov, Jan Antfolk, Gabriela-Mariana Marcu, Jana Schrötter, Jonas R. Kunst, Sandra J. Geiger, Adeyemi Adetula, Halil Emre Kocalar, Julita Kielińska, Pavol Kačmár, Ahmed Bokkour, Oscar J. Galindo-Caballero, Ikhlas Djamai, Sara Johanna Pöntinen, Bamikole Emmanuel Agesin, Teodor Jernsäther, Anum Urooj, Nikolay R. Rachev, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Murathan Kurfalı, Ilse L. Pit, Ranran Li, Sami Çoksan, Dmitrii Dubrov, Tamar Elise Paltrow, Gabriel Baník, Tatiana Korobova, Anna Studzinska, Xiaoming Jiang, John Jamir Benzon R Aruta, Jáchym Vintr, Faith Chiu, Lada Kaliska, Jana B. Berkessel, Murat Tümer, Sara Morales-Izquierdo, Hu Chuan-Peng, Kevin Vezirian, Anna Dalla Rosa, Olga Bialobrzeska, Martin R. Vasilev, Julia Beitner, Ondřej Kácha, Barbara Žuro, Minja Westerlund, Mina Nedelcheva-Datsova, Andrej Findor, Dajana Krupić, Marta Kowal, Adrian Dahl Askelund, Razieh Pourafshari, Jasna Milošević Đorđević, Nadya-Daniela Schmidt, Ekaterina Baklanova, Anna Szala, Ilya Zakharov, Marek A. Vranka, Keiko Ihaya, Caterina Grano, Nicola Cellini, Michał Białek, Lisa Anton-Boicuk, Ilker Dalgar, Arca Adıgüzel, Jeroen P H Verharen, Princess Lovella G Maturan, Angelos P. Kassianos, Raquel Oliveira, Martin Čadek, Vera Cubela Adoric, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Therese E. Sverdrup, Balazs Aczel, Danilo Zambrano, Afroja Ahmed, Christian Krog Tamnes, Yuki Yamada, Leonhard Volz, Naoyuki Sunami, Lilian Suter, Luc Vieira, Agata Groyecka-Bernard, Julia Arhondis Kamburidis, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Mikayel Harutyunyan, Gabriel Agboola Adetula, Tara Bulut Allred, Krystian Barzykowski, Benedict G. Antazo, Andras N. Zsido, Dušana Dušan Šakan, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, Lina Pernilla Ahlgren, Matej Hruška, Diego Vega, Efisio Manunta, Aviv Mokady, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Marcel Martončik, Nicolas Say, Katarzyna Filip, Roosevelt Vilar, Karolina Staniaszek, Milica Vdovic, Matus Adamkovic, Niklas Johannes, Nandor Hajdu, Noga Cohen, Clara Overkott, Dino Krupić, Barbora Hubena, Gustav Nilsonne, Giovanna Mioni, Claudio Singh Solorzano, Tatsunori Ishii, Zhang Chen, Elizaveta Kushnir, Cemre Karaarslan, Rafael R. Ribeiro, Ahmed Khaoudi, Małgorzata Kossowska, Jozef Bavolar, Karlijn Hoyer, Marta Roczniewska, Alper Karababa, Maja Becker, Renan P. Monteiro, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Irem Metin-Orta, Sylwia Adamus, Luca Kozma, Gabriela Czarnek, Artur Domurat, Eva Štrukelj, Daniela Serrato Alvarez, Michal Parzuchowski, Sébastien Massoni, Johanna Czamanski-Cohen, Ekaterina Pronizius, Fany Muchembled, Kevin van Schie, Aslı Saçaklı, Evgeniya Hristova, Anna O. Kuzminska, Abdelilah Charyate, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Reza Afhami, Nadyanna M. Majeed, Erica D. Musser, Miroslav Sirota, Robert M. Ross, Siu Kit Yeung, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Francesco Foroni, Inês A T Almeida, Dmitry Grigoryev, David M G Lewis, Dawn L. Holford, Steve M J Janssen, Srinivasan Tatachari, Carlota Batres, Jonas K. Olofsson, Shimrit Daches, Anabel Belaus, Gerit Pfuhl, Nadia Sarai Corral-Frias, Daniela Sousa, Jan Philipp Röer, Peder Mortvedt Isager, Hendrik Godbersen, Radoslaw B. Walczak, Natalia Van Doren, Dongning Ren, Tripat Gill, Martin Voracek, Lisa M. DeBruine, Michele Anne, Sanja Batić Očovaj, Andrew G. Thomas, Alexios Arvanitis, Thomas Ostermann, Kelly Wolfe, Nwadiogo Chisom Arinze, Carsten Bundt, Claus Lamm, Robert J. Calin-Jageman, William E. Davis, Maria Karekla, Saša Zorjan, Lisa M. Jaremka, Jim Uttley, Monika Hricova, Monica A. Koehn, Natalia Kiselnikova, Hui Bai, Anthony J. Krafnick, Busra Bahar Balci, Tonia Ballantyne, Samuel Lins, Zahir Vally, Celia Esteban-Serna, Kathleen Schmidt, Paulo Manuel L Macapagal, Paulina Szwed, Przemysław Marcin Zdybek, David Moreau, W Matthew Collins, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Iris Vilares, Ulrich S. Tran, Jordane Boudesseul, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Barnaby James Wyld Dixson, Jennifer T. Perillo, Ana Ferreira, Erin C. Westgate, Christopher L. Aberson, Azuka Ikechukwu Arinze, Bastian Jaeger, Muhammad Mussaffa Butt, Jaime R. Silva, Daniel Shafik Storage, Allison P. Janak, William Jiménez-Leal, Jose A. Soto, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Randy McCarthy, Alexa M. Tullett, Martha Frias-Armenta, Matheus Fernando Felix Ribeiro, Andree Hartanto, Paul A G Forbes, Megan L. Willis, María Del Carmen Tejada R, Adriana Julieth Olaya Torres, Ian D. Stephen, David C. Vaidis, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Karen Yu, Clare A M Sutherland, Mathi Manavalan, Behzad Behzadnia, Jan Urban, Ernest Baskin, Joseph P. McFall, Chisom Esther Ogbonnaya, Cynthia H Y Fu, Rima-Maria Rahal, Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe, Thomas J. Hostler, Heather Barry Kappes, Piotr Sorokowski, Meetu Khosla, Ljiljana B. Lazarevic, Luis Eudave, Johannes K. Vilsmeier, Elkin O. Luis, Rafał Muda, Elena Agadullina, Rodrigo A. Cárcamo, Crystal Reeck, Gulnaz Anjum, Mónica Camila Toro Venegas, Michal Misiak, Richard M. Ryan, Nora L. Nock, Giovanni A. Travaglino, Michael C. Mensink, Gilad Feldman, Aaron L. Wichman, Weilun Chou, Ignazio Ziano, Martin Seehuus, William J. Chopik, Franki Y H Kung, Joelle Carpentier, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Hongfei Du, Qinyu Xiao, Tiago J S Lima, Chris Noone, Sandersan Onie, Frederick Verbruggen, Theda Radtke, Maximilian A. Primbs (2023) Show all contributors
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, geographical and cultural context characterization, and demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73,223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore coping, framing, and self-determination across a diverse, global sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Marilena Juttemeier, April H. Bailey, Gulnaz Anjum, Alexander S. English, Milan Obaidi, DAVID SAM, Fatma Yaşın-Tekizoğlu, Collins B. Agyemang (2023)
People tend to think of the prototypical person as a man more than as a woman, but this bias has primarily been observed in language-based tasks. Here, we investigated whether this bias is also present in the mental imagery of faces. A preregistered cross-cultural reverse-correlation study including participants from six WEIRD and non-WEIRD countries varying in gender equality (i.e., China, Ghana, Norway, Pakistan, Turkey, and the US; N = 645) unexpectedly suggested that people imagine the face of a generic “person” more as a woman than as a man. Replicating this unexpected result, a second preregistered study (N = 115) showed that U.S. participants imagine the face of a typical person as being more similar to their imagined face of a woman than of a man. We discuss explanations for these unexpected findings, including the possibility that the prototypical person is male-biased—consistent with previous work—but the default face may be female-biased.
Article Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Sander van der Linden, Michal Piksa, Mikołaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula, Paweł Gwiaździński, Karolina Noworyta, Jonas R. Kunst (2023)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Simon Ozer, Katharina Lefringhausen, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Milan Obaidi, DAVID SAM (2023)
Do minority-group members welcome or reject that majority-group members adopt other cultures? Acculturation is commonly defined as a process of mutual accommodation. Yet, the acculturation of majority-group members has only recently received research attention. To date, we do not know the extent to which minority-group members expect majority-group members to adopt the culture of minority groups and/or to maintain their mainstream culture. Knowledge is also lacking about how these expectations relate to minority-group members’ own acculturation orientations and symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. We further do not know whether such associations are similar among minority- and majority-group members. To address these gaps, we surveyed 246 Muslim minority-group members and 247 White Christian majority-group members in the United Kingdom. Muslim minority-group members’ acculturation expectations towards majority-group members were normally distributed around the midpoint of the scale, suggesting that they did not reject majority-group acculturation on average. Acculturation expectations were correlated with symbolic and realistic threat perceptions among majority-group members but not among minority-group members. Cluster analyses showed that integrated Muslim minority-group members found it relatively important for majority-group members to adopt minority-group culture and to maintain their own culture. In sum, the results support the idea that minority-group members, at least in some contexts and settings, view acculturation as a mutual cultural change rather than as cultural appropriation.
Review article Paweł Gwiaździński, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Michal Piksa, Izabela Krysińska, Jonas R. Kunst, Karolina Noworyta, Agata Olejniuk, Mikołaj Morzy, Rafal Rygula, Tomi Wójtowicz, ... (2023) Jan Piasecki (2023) Show all contributors
Article Tuuli Anna Renvik, Viivi Eskelinen, Jonas R. Kunst, Jolanda Jetten, Jolanda van der Noll, Anette Rohmann, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti (2023)
Article Sasha Y. Kimel, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Milan Obaidi, Anita Foeman, Bessie Lawton, James Sidanius, Jonas R. Kunst (2023)
Article Sam Fluit, Jonas R. Kunst, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Tilmann von Soest (2023)
Although life trajectories are frequently theorized to explain people’s attitudes toward different social groups, few studies have been able to directly assess their importance with suitable data. Addressing this gap and focusing on the development of general and domain-specific self-esteem, we report results from a population-based sample of Norwegians (N = 2,215) followed over 28 years and five time points from adolescence to midlife. Growth curve models demonstrated that irrespective of self-esteem domain, low levels of self-esteem in adolescence as well as a depressed self-esteem development over the next three decades were related to more overall opposition to social equality as well as more opposition to gender equality and immigration in midlife. The results held when controlling for participants’ baseline political orientations and other key covariates in adolescence. Our findings indicate that low self-esteem and a lack of posi- tive self-esteem development can be detrimental to harmonious intergroup relations in ever-diversifying societies. We discuss how future psychological interventions aimed at enhancing self-esteem may promote support for a more inclusive society.
Article Justine Dandy, Adiran Doidge, Katharina Lefringhausen, Jonas R. Kunst, Abraham Kenin (2023)
Article Milan Obaidi, Gulnaz Anjum, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, John F. Dovidio, Simon Ozer, Jonas R. Kunst (2023)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Ann-Cathrin Coenen, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Milan Obaidi (2023)
Article Hajra Tahir, Jonas R. Kunst, DAVID SAM (2023)
Muslims in the U.K. who maintain their religious culture are often viewed as a suspect community. This pre-registered experimental research examined the mediating role of perceived (dis)loyalty as underlying process and the moderating role of acculturation expectations. A total of 334 non-Muslim White British participants in Study 1 and 810 in Study 2 were asked to indicate their acculturation expectations towards Muslims. They were then randomly assigned to read a text that described Muslims in a fictional town as either (a) maintaining their religious culture or (b) adopting the mainstream British culture, or they read (c) a neutral control text. As expected, in Study 1, when Muslims were presented as maintaining their religious culture, trust decreased compared to the control group. Conversely, when described as adopting the mainstream culture, trust increased while support for surveillance of Muslims decreased. Both effects were mediated by the perception of Muslims being disloyal or loyal to the U.K in both studies, respectively. Perceived loyalty to their religious group did not significantly mediate any effect. We replicated these findings in Study 2. Moreover, we showed that describing Muslims as maintaining their religious culture decreased trust and increased support for surveillance especially among participants who expected Muslims to give up their religious culture. Moderated mediation analysis showed that these effects were partly mediated by perceived loyalty to the U.K. We discuss the societal implications of the findings for policymakers and Muslim leaders along with recommendations for future research.
Article John Melvin Gudnyson Treider, Jonas R. Kunst, Jonna Katariina Vuoskoski (2023)
Article Michal Piksa, Karolina Noworyta, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst, Mikoƚaj Morzy, Jan Piasecki, Rafal Rygula (2023)
Article Anders Hustad Varmann, Line Kruse, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Angel Gomez, Alexandra Vázquez, Jonas R. Kunst (2023)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Kinga Bierwiaczonek (2023)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Jannicke Kirkøen, Onab Mohamdain (2022)
Abstract Purpose Physically less attractive job applicants are discriminated against in hiring decisions. In a US context, the authors tested whether appearance-altering photo-filters can exploit this bias, focusing on the moderating role of job type, gender and race as well the mediating role of two major dimensions of person perception (warmth and competence). Design/methodology/approach In study 1, 223 managers evaluated White mock applicants presented with or without a beautifying filter for either a position as a social worker or an IT specialist. In study 2, 212 managers evaluated Black and White mock applicants with or without beautifying filters for an HR specialist position. Findings In study 1, beautifying filters increased perceived hireability irrespective of job type, but especially when applicants were female. Both male and female applicants whose photos were filtered were perceived as more competent, but only male applicants were perceived as warmer. In study 2, beautifying filters increased the hireability only slightly for White female applicants, followed by White and Black male applicants but substantially for Black female applicants. The filters increased the perceived competence of Black (and especially Black female) applicants but not of White applicants and increased the perceived warmth of all groups except for White females. Warmth and competence partially mediated the observed effects on hireability in both studies. Originality/value In the context of widely available technological advances, the authors show that beautifying photo-filters can exploit attractiveness biases, at least at an early hiring stage. The results emphasize the importance of intersecting factors such as gender and race.
Article Nicole Legate, Thuy-vy Nguyen, Netta Weinstein, Arlen C Moller, Lisa Legault, Zahir Vally, Vidar Schei, Therese E. Sverdrup, Max Korbmacher, Maria Louise Lund, ... (2022) Kristoffer Klevjer, Jonas R. Kunst, Gerit Pfuhl, Christian Krog Tamnes, Carsten Bundt, Adrian Dahl Askelund, Zuzanna Tajchman, Andras N. Zsido, Miha Zrimsek, Zhang Chen, Ignazio Ziano, Zoi Gialitaki, Chris D. Ceary, Yuna Jang, Yijun Lin, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yuki Yamada, Qinyu Xiao, Xiaoming Jiang, Xinkai Du, Elvin Yao, William S. Ryan, John Paul Wilson, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, William Jimenez-Leal, Wilbert Law, Wenceslao Unanue, W. Matthew Collins, Karley L. Richard, Marek Vranka, Vladislav Ankushev, Veronika Lerche, Vanja Kovic, Valerija Križanić, Veselina Hristova Kadreva, Vera Cubela Adoric, Ulrich S. Tran, Siu Kit Yeung, Widad Hassan, Ralph Houston (2022) Show all contributors
Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges.
Article Milan Obaidi, Sara With Skaar, Simon Ozer, Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, John F. Dovidio, April Bailey, Milan Obaidi (2022)
Editorial Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article Michal Piksa, Karolina Noworyta, Jan Piasecki, Pawel Gwiazdzinski, Aleksander Bjørge Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst, Rafal Rygula (2022)
Article Charles A Dorison, Jennifer S. Lerner, Blake H. Heller, Alexander J. Rothman, Ichiro I. Kawachi, Ke Wang, Vidar Schei, Therese Sverdrup, Max Korbmacher, Maria Louise Lund, ... (2022) Kristoffer Klevjer, Jonas R. Kunst, Gulnaz Anjum, Christian Krog Tamnes, Carsten Bundt, Gerit Pfuhl, Jo Adrian Dahl Askelund, Vaughan W. Rees, Brian P. Gill, Nancy Gibbs, Charles R. Ebersole, Zahir Vally, Zuzanna Tajchman, Andras N. Zsido, Mija Zrimsek, Zhang Chen, Ignazio Ziano, Zoi Gialitaki, Chris D. Ceary, Yijun Lin, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yuki Yamada, Qinyu Xiao, Xiaoming Jiang, Xinkai Du, Elvin Yao, John Paul Wilson, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, William Jimenez-Leal, Wilbert Law, W. Matthew Collins, Karley L. Richard, Marek Vranka, Vladislav Ankushev, Valerija Križanić, Veselina Hristova Kadreva, Vera Cubela Adoric, Ulrich S. Tran, Siu Kit Yeung, Widad Hassan (2022) Show all contributors
Article Katharina Lefringhausen, T. Marshall, Nelli Ferenczi, Hanna Zagefka, Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article John F. Dovidio, Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article David S. Eldor, Karine Lindholm, Maria H. Chavez, Sander Vassanyi, Michelle O. I. Badiane, Kemal Yaldizli, Petter Frøysa, Christian Andres Palacios Haugestad, Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article Ida Strande Ottersen, Nora Cornelia Glerud Benningstad, Jonas R. Kunst (2022)
Article Ann-Cathrin Coenen, Jonas R. Kunst (2021)
It has been argued that sports contexts may be suitable venues for reducing intercultural hostility, including its more extreme forms, yet empirical evidence remains scarce. The present study investigated the main and interactive influence of two sets of factors on support for violent extremism: (a) ethnic diversity of teams, that is, the heterogeneity of the team members’ ethnic origins, and (b) team members’ intercultural perceptions, including perceived social capital, contact experiences and diversity ideologies within the team. Individual-level data from 257 players nested within 36 German soccer teams were combined with assessments of the ethnic diversity of each team based on a genealogical database. Multi-level analyses were conducted. Some evidence suggested that higher ethnic diversity within a team and frequent inter-ethnic contact between its players were associ ated with more extremism. However, cross-level moderation analyses showed that ethnic diversity was associated with less support for violent extremist groups when inter-ethnic contact quality was high. Perceptions of colorblind team ideologies that focus on minimiz ing/ignoring differences between groups were associated with lower threat perceptions and extremism. While social capital generally played little of a role, one social capital indicator, norms of behavior, was unexpectedly associated with higher threat perceptions. Overall, the present findings suggest that increasing ethnic diversity in sports teams may in itself not reduce extremist attitudes and sometimes may even backfire. Rather, how intercultural relations are managed within these contexts seems decisive. Prioritizing venues for posi tive contact experiences between soccer players of different backgrounds seems essential.
Article Christian Andres Palacios Haugestad, Anja Duun Skauge, Jonas R. Kunst, Seamus Power (2021)
The #FridaysForFuture movement has attracted young activists around the world. In the present mixed-method, socio-cultural psychological research, we investigate people's motivations for joining the movement in the privileged yet paradoxical context of Norway – a country that has gathered most of its wealth through oil production (i.e., the Norwegian Paradox). In Study 1, from a thematic analysis of in-depth ethnographic fieldwork from a series of major strikes and interviews with protestors (N = 93) it emerged that attributing responsibility for climate change, a necessity for shared action to mitigate the effects of climate change, and a shared sense of collective identity, helped to galvanize the prolonged social movement. These inductive and ecologically valid findings, combined with existing theory, in Study 2, partially confirmed and extended the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA; van Zomeren et al., 2008) with survey data from high school students (N = 362). Collective guilt, environmental threat, past protest participation, organized environmentalism, political orientation, and social capital predicted future protest intentions, whereas activist identification and group efficacy mediated these effects. We discuss how the understanding of global environmental movements from the perspective of participants, who are both structurally responsible for the crisis and will experience most of its consequences themselves, can contribute to the broader discussion on facilitating climate action within privileged contexts.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Katharina Lefringhausen, Sara With Skaar, Milan Obaidi (2021)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, John F. Dovidio (2021)
Article Ke Wang, Jonas R. Kunst, Christian Krog Tamnes, Vidar Schei, Therese E. Sverdrup, Adrian Dahl Askelund, Gerit Pfuhl, Kristoffer Klevjer, Max Korbmacher, Carsten Bundt, ... (2021) Amit Goldberg, Charles A. Dorison, Jeremy K. Miller, Andero Uusberg, Jennifer Lerner, James J Gross, Bamikole Bamikole Agesin, Marcia Bernardo, Olatz Campos, Luis Eudave, Karolina Grzech, Daphna Hausman Ozery, Elkin Oswaldo Luis Garcia, Emily A. Jackson, Shira Meir Drexler, Anita Penic Jurkovic, Kafeel Rana, John Paul Wilson, Maria Antoniadi, Kermeka Desai, Zoi Gialitaki, Elizaveta Kushnir, Khaoula Nadif, Olalla Nino Bravo, Rafia Nauman, Marlies Oosterlinck, Myrto Pantazi, Natalia Pilecka, Anna Szabelska, I.M.M. van Steenkiste, Katarzyna Filip, Andrea Ioana Bozdoc, Gabriela Mariana Marcu, Elena Agadullina, Matus Adamkovic, Marta Roczinewska, Cecilia Reyana, Angelos P. Kassianos, Minja Westerlund, Lina Ahlgren, Sara Pöntinen (2021) Show all contributors
The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries and regions (n = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vesus both control conditions) consistently reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing interventions had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world.
Article Viivi Eskelinen, Tuuli Anna Renvik, Teemu Pauha, Jolanda Jetten, Jonas R. Kunst, Jolanda van der Noll, Anette Rohmann, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti (2021)
Article Ozer Simon, Jonas R. Kunst, Seth J. Schwartz (2021)
Article Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst, Simon Ozer, Sasha Y. Kimel (2021)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Milan Obaidi, Ann-Cathrin Coenen, Vilde Dyvik Vasseljen, Paul Gill (2021)
Article Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Jonas R. Kunst (2021)
Article Viivi Eskelinen, Teemu Pauha, Jonas R. Kunst, Antti Räsänen, Inga Jasinskaja - Lahti (2021)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Katharina Lefringhausen, David Sam, John W. Berry, John F. Dovidio (2021)
Article Jonas R. Kunst (2021)
Article Katharina Lefringhausen, Nelli Ferenczi, Tara C. Marshall, Jonas R. Kunst (2021)
Article Christopher Petsko, Ryan Lei, Jonas R. Kunst, Emile Bruneau, Nour Kteily (2020)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Olivia Pich (2020)
Article Fatih Uenal, Robin Bergh, James Sidanius, Andreas Zick, Sasha Y. Kimel, Jonas R. Kunst (2020)
Article Kinga Maria Bierwiaczonek, Jonas R. Kunst, Olivia Pich (2020)
Review article Jonas R. Kunst, Milan Obaidi (2020)
Article Anna Kende, Márton Hadarics, Sára Bigazzi, Mihaela Boza, Jonas R. Kunst, Nóra Anna Lantos, Barbara Lášticová, Anca Minescu, Monica Pivetti, Ana Urbiola (2020)
Article Frederike S. Woelfert, Jonas R. Kunst (2020)
Article Teemu Pauha, Anna Renvik Tuuli, Viivi Eskelinen, Jolanda Jetten, Jolanda van der Noll, Jonas R. Kunst, Anette Rohmann, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti (2020)
Article Nora C. G Benningstad, Jonas R. Kunst (2019)
Article Hajra Tahir, Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam (2019)
In many Western countries, the public has extensively debated factors potentially leading Muslim minority-group members to support violence by foreign extremist states or to commit violence themselves. Here, one central question has been whether their acculturation orientations may play a role. Combining perspectives from intergroup threat theory and acculturation psychology, the present study investigated whether one reason for why threat perceptions lead to higher violent behavioral intentions among Muslims, as evidence by previous research, may be that they are related to distinct acculturation orientations. It tested this proposition in two samples comprising of Norwegian (N = 253) and British Muslims (N = 194). The more Norwegian Muslims perceived realistic threat, the more violent behavioral intentions they showed, but this relation was not mediated by acculturation. Among British Muslims, mainstream acculturation orientation was related to more violent intentions, while threat was not. In both samples, symbolic threat was associated with more support for Muslim military violence and this relationship was mediated by religious acculturation in the U.K. In contrast to previous research, symbolic threat was linked with less personal intentions to commit violence in the U.K., mediated by religious acculturation. Complementary analyses calculating acculturation strategies indicated that assimilated, and to some extend integrated, Muslims in both countries tended to show the highest violent behavioral intentions. By contrast, separated individuals showed the highest level of support for Muslim military violence. Ways in which these findings can be used to counter violence and improve intergroup relations in Western ethnically diverse societies are discussed.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Lotte Thomsen, John F. Dovidio (2019)
Article Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø, Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski, Olav Vassend, Espen Røysamb, Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Jonas R. Kunst, Lotte Thomsen (2019)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, John F. Dovidio, Lotte Thomsen (2019)
Article Alexander S. English, Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam (2019)
Little is known about how climatic differences may psychologically impact individuals who migrate from one geographical area to another. A climatic demand theory perspective suggests that migration from more demanding climatic areas to less demanding climatic areas would lead to better psychological outcomes while predicting the opposite for migration from less demanding to more demanding climates. In contrast, a climatic‐fit perspective would predict that moving to areas that climatically are similar to one's home would lead to the best psychological outcomes whereas any major deviation would lead to worse outcomes. To test these competing perspectives, a longitudinal, multisite study was conducted with over 1,000 student migrants who moved from various areas in China to 12 cities. Participants’ life satisfaction and perceived stress were assessed upon arrival and at the end of the semester together with their sociocultural adaptation. Supporting the climatic‐fit perspective, multilevel analyses showed that participants reported the least stress and highest sociocultural adaptation when they migrated to host sites that were climatically similar to their homes. Conversely, individuals who migrated from very demanding to less demanding climatic regions and vice versa reported an increase in stress and lower sociocultural adaptation.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Beverly Karen Boos, Sasha Kimel, Milan Obaidi, Maor Shani, Lotte Thomsen (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Lisa Sophie Myhren, Ivuoma N. Onyeador (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Beverly Karen Boos, Sasha Y. Kimel, Milan Obaidi, Maor Shani, Lotte Thomsen (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Christian Andrés Palacios Haugestad (2018)
Article Aleksander Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, John F. Dovidio, Ron Dotsch (2018)
Article Janis Heinrich Zickfeld, Jonas R. Kunst, Sigrid Møyner Hohle (2018)
Article Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst, Nour Kteily, Thomsen Lotte, James Sidanius (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Sasha Kimel, Maor Shani, Ramzi Alayan, Lotte Thomsen (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, April Bailey, Claire Nicole Prendergast, Aleksander Gundersen (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Esther N. Phillibert (2018)
Article Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst, Nour Kteily, Lotte Thomsen, Jim Sidanius (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Beverly Karen Boos, Sasha Y. Kimel, Milan Obaidi, Lotte Thomsen, Maor Shani (2018)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Fischer Ronald, Jim Sidanius, Lotte Thomsen (2017)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Nour Kteily, Lotte Thomsen (2017)
Article Ingvild Haugen, Jonas R. Kunst (2017)
Article Ole Jørgen Johansson, Jonas R. Kunst (2017)
People with mental disorders often face prejudices that can further deteriorate their condition. We tested whether Social Dominance Orientation (SDO), Right‐Wing Authoritarianism (RWA), and Belief in a Just World (BJW), and characteristics of the mentally ill predict such prejudices. Both in a general population sample and a sample of health professionals and trainees, SDO, but not RWA and BJW, predicted more prejudice, although this pattern was less pronounced among health professionals/trainees. BJW interacted with the targets' gender in Study 1, predicting less empathy toward a male but not toward a female mentally ill person. In Study 2, depressed individuals were blamed more for their illness than those with schizophrenia or cancer. Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Talieh Sadeghi, Hajra Tahir, David Lackland Sam, Lotte Thomsen (2016)
Article Sasha Kimel, R. Huesmann, Jonas R. Kunst, Eran Halperin (2016)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Sigrid Hohle (2016)
Article Madeleine Mahin Dalsklev, Jonas R. Kunst (2015)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Lotte Thomsen, David Lackland Sam, John W. Berry (2015)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Lotte Thomsen (2015)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Gøril Kvamme Løset, Daniel Hosøy, Bjørn Bjorvatn, Bente Elisabeth Moen, Nils Magerøy, Ståle Pallesen (2014)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam (2014)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, Lotte Thomsen, David Lackland Sam (2014)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam (2013)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam, Pål Ulleberg (2013)
Article Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam (2013)
Article Jonas Rønningdalen Kunst, Hajra Tajamal, David Lackland Sam, Pål Ulleberg (2012)
Islamophobic sentiments in the Western world have gained scientific attention, particularly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. However, the effects of religious stigma on Muslim minorities’ identity formation have rarely been studied. Using structural equation modeling, this cross-sectional study examined direct and indirect effects of different forms of religious stigma on the national affiliation of 210 Norwegian-Pakistani and 216 German-Turkish Muslims. Furthermore, the study examined the mediator role of religious identity. Our results suggest that being a Muslim in Norway is more reconcilable with affiliating with the nation than being a Muslim in Germany. However, across the samples, the results indicated that various forms of religious stigma affected Muslims’ national identity and engagement in the public and private sphere in distinct ways. These effects were both positive and negative, differed between the two samples, and in Germany, were mediated by the participants’ religious identity. The findings indicated that the ways in which religious stigma influences Muslims’ national affiliation is context and culture bound.
Media Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Min advarsel handler om den finansielle boblen som nå blåses opp rundt KI-teknologien. Dette er en kritikk av markedet, ikke maskinen.
Media Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Løftet var todelt: en produktivitetsrevolusjon for næringslivet og en teknologisk snarvei til å løse menneskehetens store utfordringer. Begge deler viser seg nå å være en illusjon.
Feature article Samantha Marie Harris, Hege Høivik Bye, Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Participation in media Jonas R. Kunst, Lubna Jaffery, Ammal Ahmed Haj Mohamed (2025)
Interview Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Interview Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
– Selv i de ekstreme miljøene var de litt sjokkerte over hvordan enkelte plattformer sprer innholdet deres, sier journalist som fulgte ekstreme grupper på internett.
Lecture Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Introduction Jonas R. Kunst, Milan Obaidi (2025)
Other Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Conference lecture Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Lecture Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Conference lecture Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Conference lecture Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Conference lecture Jonas R. Kunst (2025)
Journal Ke Wang, Amit Goldenberg, Charles A. Dorison, Jeremy K. Miller, Andero Uusberg, Jennifer S. Lerner, James J. Gross, Bamikole Bamikole Agesin, Márcia Bernardo, Olatz Campos, ... (2022) Luis Eudave, Karolina Grzech, Daphna Hausman Ozery, Emily A. Jackson, Elkin Oswaldo Luis Garcia, Shira Meir Drexler, Anita Penić Jurković, Kafeel Rana, John Paul Wilson, Maria Antoniadi, Kermeka Desai, Zoi Gialitaki, Elizaveta Kushnir, Khaoula Nadif, Olalla Niño Bravo, Rafia Nauman, Marlies Oosterlinck, Myrto Pantazi, Natalia Pilecka, Anna Szabelska, Steenkiste van Steenkiste, Katarzyna Filip, Andreea Ioana Bozdoc, Gabriela Mariana Marcu, Elena Agadullina, Matúš Adamkovič, Marta Roczniewska, Cecilia Reyna, Angelos P. Kassianos, Minja Westerlund, Lina Ahlgren, Sara Pöntinen, Gabriel Agboola Adetula, Pinar Dursun, Azuka Ikechukwu Arinze, Nwadiogo Chisom Arinze, Chisom Esther Ogbonnaya, Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe, Ilker Dalgar, Handan Akkas, Paulo Manuel Macapagal, Savannah Lewis, Irem Metin-Orta, Francesco Foroni, Megan Willis, Anabela Caetano Santos, Aviv Mokady, Niv Reggev, Merve A. Kurfali, Martin R. Vasilev, Nora L. Nock, Michal Parzuchowski, Mauricio F. Espinoza Barría, Marek Vranka, Markéta Braun Kohlová, Ivan Ropovik, Mikayel Harutyunyan, Chunhui Wang, Elvin Yao, Maja Becker, Efisio Manunta, Gwenael Kaminski, Jordane Boudesseul, Dafne Marko, Kortnee Evans, David M G Lewis, Andrej Findor, Anais Thibault Landry, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Manuel S. Ortiz, Zahir Vally, Ekaterina Pronizius, Martin Voracek, Claus Lamm, Maurice Grinberg, Ranran Li, Jaroslava Varella Valentova, Giovanna Mioni, Nicola Cellini, Sau-Chin Chen, Janis Heinrich Zickfeld, Karis Moon, Habiba Azab, Neil Levy, Alper Karababa, Jennifer L. Beaudry, Leanne Boucher, W Matthew Collins, Anna Louise Todsen, Kevin van Schie, Jáchym Vintr, Jozef Bavolar, Lada Kaliska, Valerija Križanić, Lara Samojlenko, Razieh Pourafshari, Sandra J. Geiger, Julia Beitner, Lara Warmelink, Robert M. Ross, Ian D. Stephen, Thomas J. Hostler, Soufian Azouaghe, Randy McCarthy, Anna Szala, Caterina Grano, Claudio Singh Solorzano, Gulnaz Anjum, William Jimenez-Leal, Maria Bradford, Laura Calderón Pérez, Julio E. Cruz Vásquez, Oscar J. Galindo-Caballero, Juan Camilo Vargas-Nieto, Ondřej Kácha, Alexios Arvanitis, Qinyu Xiao, Rodrigo Cárcamo, Saša Zorjan, Zuzanna Tajchman, Iris Vilares, Jeffrey M. Pavlacic, Jonas R. Kunst, Christian Krog Tamnes, Claudia C. von Bastian, Mohammad Atari, MohammadHasan Sharifian, Monika Hricova, Pavol Kačmár, Jana Schrötter, Rima-Maria Rahal, Noga Cohen, Saeideh FatahModares, Miha Zrimsek, Ilya Zakharov, Monica A. Koehn, Celia Esteban-Serna, Robert J. Calin-Jageman, Anthony J. Krafnick, Eva Štrukelj, Peder Mortvedt Isager, Jan Urban, Jaime R. Silva, Marcel Martončik, Sanja Batić Očovaj, Dušana Šakan, Anna O. Kuzminska, Jasna Milosevic Djordjevic, Inês A T Almeida, Ana Ferreira, Ljiljana B. Lazarevic, Harry Manley, Danilo Zambrano Ricaurte, Renan P. Monteiro, Zahra Etabari, Erica Musser, Daniel Dunleavy, Weilun Chou, Hendrik Godbersen, Susana Ruiz-Fernández, Crystal Reeck, Carlota Batres, Komila Kirgizova, Abdumalik Muminov, Flavio Azevedo, Daniela Serrato Alvarez, Muhammad Mussaffa Butt, Jeong Min Lee, Zhang Chen, Frederick Verbruggen, Ignazio Ziano, Murat Tümer, Abdelilah C A Charyate, Dmitrii Dubrov, María Del Carmen M C Tejada Rivera, Christopher Aberson, Bence Pálfi, Mónica Alarcón Maldonado, Barbora Hubena, Asli Sacakli, Chris D. Ceary, Karley L. Richard, Gage Singer, Jennifer T. Perillo, Tonia Ballantyne, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, Maksim Fedotov, Hongfei Du, Magdalena Wielgus, Ilse L. Pit, Matej Hruška, Daniela Sousa, Balazs Aczel, Nandor Hajdu, Barnabas Szaszi, Sylwia Adamus, Krystian Barzykowski, Leticia Micheli, Nadya-Daniela Schmidt, Andras N. Zsido, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Rafał Muda, Michal Bialek, Marta Kowal, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Michal Misiak, Débora Mola, María Victoria Ortiz, Pablo Sebastián Correa, Anabel Belaus, Fany Muchembled, Rafael R. Ribeiro, Patricia Arriaga, Raquel Oliveira, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Paulina Szwed, Małgorzata Kossowska, Gabriela Czarnek, Julita Kielińska, Benedict Antazo, Ruben Betlehem, Stefan Stieger, Gustav Nilsonne, Nicolle Simonovic, Jennifer Taber, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Artur Domurat, Keiko Ihaya, Yuki Yamada, Anum Urooj, Tripat Gill, Martin Čadek, Lisa Bylinina, Johanna Messerschmidt, Murathan Kurfalı, Adeyemi Adetula, Ekaterina Baklanova, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Heather B. Kappes, Biljana Gjoneska, Thea House, Marc V. Jones, Jana B. Berkessel, William J. Chopik, Sami Çoksan, Martin Seehuus, Ahmed Khaoudi, Ahmed Bokkour, Kanza Ait El Arabi, Ikhlas Djamai, Aishwarya Iyer, Neha Parashar, Arca Adiguzel, Halil Emre Kocalar, Carsten Bundt, James O. Norton, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Anabel De la Rosa-Gomez, Vladislav Ankushev, Natalia Bogatyreva, Dmitry Grigoryev, Aleksandr Ivanov, Irina Prusova, Marina Romanova, Irena Sarieva, Maria Terskova, Evgeniya Hristova, Veselina Hristova Kadreva, Allison Janak, Vidar Schei, Therese E. Sverdrup, Adrian Dahl Askelund, Lina Maria Sanabria Pineda, Dajana Krupić, Carmel A. Levitan, Niklas Johannes, Nihal Ouherrou, Nicolas Say, Sladjana Sinkolova, Kristina Janjić, Marija Stojanovska, Dragana Stojanovska, Meetu Khosla, Andrew G. Thomas, Franki Y H Kung, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Farnaz Mosannenzadeh, Busra Bahar Balci, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Ernest Baskin, Byurakn Ishkhanyan, Johanna Czamanski-Cohen, Barnaby James Wyld Dixson, David Moreau, Clare A M Sutherland, Hu Chuan-Peng, Chris Noone, Heather Flowe, Michele Anne, Steve M J Janssen, Marta Topor, Nadyanna M. Majeed, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Karen Yu, Shimrit Daches, Andree Hartanto, Milica Vdovic, Lisa Anton-Boicuk, Paul A G Forbes, Julia Kamburidis, Evelina Marinova, Mina Nedelcheva-Datsova, Nikolay R. Rachev, Alina Stoyanova, Kathleen Schmidt, Jordan W. Suchow, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Teodor Jernsäther, Jonas K. Olofsson, Olga Bialobrzeska, Magdalena Marszalek, Srinivasan Tatachari, Reza Afhami, Wilbert Law, Jan Antfolk, Barbara Žuro, Natalia Van Doren, Jose A. Soto, Rachel Searston, Jacob Miranda, Kaja Damnjanović, Siu Kit Yeung, Dino Krupić, Karlijn Hoyer, Bastian Jaeger, Dongning Ren, Gerit Pfuhl, Kristoffer Klevjer, Nadia S. Corral-Frías, Martha Frias-Armenta, Marc Y. Lucas, Adriana Olaya Torres, Mónica Toro, Lady Grey Javela Delgado, Diego Vega, Sara Álvarez Solas, Roosevelt Vilar, Sébastien Massoni, Thomas Frizzo, Alexandre Bran, David C. Vaidis, Luc Vieira, Bastien Paris, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Anna Greenburgh, Cassie M. Whitt, Alexa M. Tullett, Xinkai Du, Leonhard Volz, Minke Jasmijn Bosma, Cemre Karaarslan, Eylül Sarıoğuz, Tara Bulut Allred, Max Korbmacher, Melissa F. Colloff, Tiago J S Lima, Matheus Fernando Felix Ribeiro, Jeroen P H Verharen, Maria Karekla, Christiana Karashiali, Naoyuki Sunami, Lisa M. Jaremka, Daniel Storage, Sumaiya Habib, Anna Studzinska, Paul H P Hanel, Dawn Liu Holford, Miroslav Sirota, Kelly Wolfe, Faith Chiu, Andriana Theodoropoulou, El Rim Ahn, Yijun Lin, Erin C. Westgate, Hilmar Brohmer, Gabriela Hofer, Olivier Dujols, Kevin Vezirian, Gilad Feldman, Giovanni A. Travaglino, Afroja Ahmed, Manyu Li, Jasmijn Bosch, Nathan Torunsky, Hui Bai, Mathi Manavalan, Xin Song, Radoslaw B. Walczak, Przemysław Zdybek, Maja Friedemann, Anna Dalla Rosa, Luca Kozma, Sara G. Alves, Samuel Lins, Isabel R. Pinto, Rita C. Correia, Peter Babinčák, Gabriel Banik, Luis Miguel Rojas-Berscia, Marco A C Varella, Jim Uttley, Julie E. Beshears, Katrine Krabbe Thommesen, Behzad Behzadnia, Shawn N. Geniole, Miguel A. Silan, Princess Lovella G Maturan, Johannes K. Vilsmeier, Ulrich S. Tran, Sara Morales Izquierdo, Michael C. Mensink, Piotr Sorokowski, Agata Groyecka-Bernard, Theda Radtke, Vera Cubela Adoric, Joelle Carpentier, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Mattie V. Hedgebeth, Tatsunori Ishii, Aaron L. Wichman, Jan Philipp Röer, Thomas Ostermann, William E. Davis, Lilian Suter, Konstantinos Papachristopoulos, Chelsea Zabel, Sandersan Onie, Charles R. Ebersole, Christopher R. Chartier, Peter R. Mallik, Heather L. Urry, Erin M. Buchanan, Nicholas A. Coles, Maximilian A. Primbs, Dana M. Basnight-Brown, Hans IJzerman, Patrick S. Forscher, Hannah Moshontz (2022) Show all contributors
Conference lecture Christian Andres Palacios Haugestad, Anja Duun Skauge, Jonas R. Kunst, Seamus Power (2021)
Conference lecture Anja Duun Skauge, Jonas R. Kunst, Seamus Power (2019)
Conference lecture Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø, Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski, Olav Vassend, Espen Røysamb, Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal, Jonas R. Kunst, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Lotte Thomsen (2019)
Conference lecture Christian Andres Palacios Haugestad, Jonas R. Kunst (2018)
Conference poster Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam, Pål Ulleberg (2013)
Conference lecture Jonas R. Kunst, David Lackland Sam (2013)
Conference lecture Jonas R. Kunst, Hajra Tajamal, David Lackland Sam, Pål Ulleberg (2012)
| Year | Academic Department | Degree |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | University of Oslo | Ph.D. |