Morten Huse
Professor Emeritus
Department of Communication and Culture
Professor Emeritus
Department of Communication and Culture
Chapter Morten Huse (2024)
Article Sibel Yamak, Morten Huse (2023)
Chapter Morten Huse, Muthu De Silva (2023)
POLYMORPHIC RESEARCH AND BOARDS OF DIRECTORS: LET US MAKE A BETTER WORLD TOGETHER Abstract: Our objective with this chapter is to show how innovative methods can help us contribute to important and path breaking research about boards and governance. We introduce polymorphic approaches, and we emphasize co-creation. The illustrations are leaning on a sharing philosophy of doing research. Polymorphic research is about alternative ways of thinking and doing research. Through polymorphic approaches we challenge existing formulaic approaches to research about boards and governance, including messages, methods, interpretations, publication, and target audiences. We present examples using introspection, the champagne method and co-creation. Our position is that while the existing methodologies are useful, the simultaneous generation of theoretically rigorous and practically impactful research requires innovative methods. We show how innovative methods in corporate governance research can contribute to solving the present crisis in research by moving the dominating research philosophy from “publish or perish” to a “sharing” philosophy. Key words: champagne method, co-creation, corporate governance, gender, introspection
Article Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson (2023)
This study theoretically and practically contributes to show how boards in SMEs can contribute to value-creation. Furthermore, a value-creating conceptual framework is developed integrating an extended team production theory. Team production theory has its roots in law and economics, and it is an alternative to agency theory (Blair & Stout, 2001). The extended team production theory has a focus on leadership and managerial behavior, and it integrates core strategy perspectives from both industrial organization and resource approaches. We were honored that an extended version of this article recently accepted for publication in the Handbook of Research in Corporate Governance and Business Ethics (Gabrielsson & Huse, 2023). In this present article, we specifically showcase to what degree boards in practice may create or destroy values within the organization and we apply a novel lens of extended team production theory to do this.
Chapter Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2023)
Abstract Sustainability has become a key concern for SMEs whose board members recognize the need to consider not only the financial bottom line but also the environmental and social performance of the business. Sustainability is about ethics because it calls on board members to consider not only the condition of current stakeholders but also the potential condition of future people that are at the mercy of contemporary unsustainable production and consumption patterns. In the chapter, we build on recent developments of the extended team production theory to discuss the characteristics and behavior of value-creating boards in SMEs. We present an integrated value-chain framework that may be used for developing the value-creating potential of boards to achieve the long-term sustainability goals of the business. Key Words: Boards, ethics, SMEs, sustainability, team production, value creation Why is it more likely that boards are destroying rather than creating values? This is the first observation that motivates the chapter. The second observation is that boards are not teams – at least not in most cases. The third observation is that team efforts at the board level can contribute to sustainable value creation in financial, social, and environmental terms. We will, in this chapter, reflect on these observations in the context of privately held small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We discuss how their boards, in practice, can be value-creators rather than only value-distributors or value-destroyers. We apply sustainability as a meta-concept that explicates the ethical aspects embedded in value creation and the moral responsibility to consider not only the financial bottom line but also environmental and social performance. In the context of SMEs, our discussion identifies how board members in practice may contribute to sustainable value creation in financial, social, environmental, and ethical terms. The chapter is built on the recent developments of the extended team production theory (e.g., Huse & Gabrielsson, 2012; Gabrielsson, Calabro, & Huse, 2016; Gabrielsson, Åberg, & Huse, 2020). Team production theory has its roots in law and economics and has been presented as an alternative to agency theory. The extended team production theory focuses on leadership and entrepreneurial behavior and integrates core strategy perspectives from both industrial organization and resource approaches. Our theorizing offers an integrated value-chain framework that may be used for developing value-creating boards in SMEs. Our discussion emphasizes that value-creating boards are highly potent agents of change with a collective capacity to prevent, mitigate and adapt to climate change and its adverse impacts on the planet and its people. However, we also recognize that many businesses rely on activities and practices damaging the environment while simultaneously mistreating employees and other stakeholders in their value-creation efforts. The often-unsustainable approaches to value creation that abounds in and around boardrooms warrant the need to integrate the requirements of a healthy economy and the needs of human society with environmental protection and restoration . Board members have a special responsibility in this regard because their decisions can have an immense impact on natural environments and on the local communities where their businesses operate. The vocabulary in this chapter supplies a toolkit that may help board members use both hands, i.e., combining many ways of creating values. Board members are in a value chain framework supposed to put their collective efforts where they add the most value while. This is typically done by paying attention to value-creating possibilities across the whole value chain. In this respect, a value-chain analysis contributes to finding possibilities for sustainable value-creation that consider not only the financial bottom line but also environmental and social performance
Chapter Morten Huse (2023)
Do we contribute to create a better world through our diversity and corporate governance research? I am in this contribution challenging formulaic diversity and corporate governance research. Scholars are challenged to use polymorphic approaches. We should dare to challenge mainstream assumptions and even dare to "swear in the church". There is a need to explore what diversity means taking into consideration a changing society and societal needs. We should try to have perspectives about the future and not only about the past. We should include the impacts of digitalization, migration, globalization, climate change, pandemics, economic inequality, and even wars.
Chapter Morten Huse (2023)
Academic book Sabina Tasheva, Morten Huse (2023)
We are presenting a collection of articles that deal with issues of gender beyond the dichotomy; intersectionality of gender and other important characteristics such as cast, ethnicity, and novel theoretical dimensions such as dynamic capabilities and digital expertise. Furthermore, this collection of articles contains a number of studies thatdelve deeper into the way that boards are working by exploring demographic faultlines and theories of proportions; and contributions that integrate insights across disciplines and decades of research into a historical overview ad multilevel framework of diversity and corporate governancne.
Anthology Morten Huse (2020)
This groundbreaking book arrives at a time of growing concern for the future of true scholarship. Morten Huse calls upon the scholarly community to reflect on the recent dramatic changes to academia, calling for coordinated efforts to reorganise the scholarly ecosystem. Offering a holistic view of academia, Huse outlines the institutions, audiences, messages, channels and communities that interact in this ecosystem, introducing a ‘sharing philosophy’ as the foundation of change. Reflecting on the past and looking to the future, this exciting book demands a communal approach to scholarship that comprises an open, innovative and impact-driven attitude to research that can change the academic game. Incisive and optimistic for the future, this book is crucial reading for PhD students and junior faculty members hoping to find new avenues for impactful and innovative research. Established scholars, as well as leaders of academic institutions, academies and associations concerned with recent structural changes to scholarship will also benefit from Huse’s strong critique and alternative pathways.
Article Sabina Tasheva, Alessandro Zattoni, Alessandro Minichilli, Morten Huse (2020)
Article Cathrine Seierstad, Ahu Tatli, Maryam Aldossari, Morten Huse (2020)
Drawing on 31 interviews, we explore the life trajectories of some of the women with most directorships in Norway after the introduction of the quota, with specific attention to their capitals. Adopting a Bourdieusian approach, we examine to what extent forced structural changes (the quota), challenge what are valued as legitimate capital(s) in the field (corporate boards). Our research demonstrates the progressive role of the quota in challenging gendered ideas of suitability. We found that structural adjustments in the field are leading to realignment in terms of the field-specific value and meaning of different types of capitals, which are redrawing the boundaries of the field in the process. We conclude that the external push through state-imposed regulation has broadened the field, resulting in the recognition of a wider set of capitals as legitimate. The study responds to the much-debated question about the utility of quotas in addressing systemic and historical inequalities.
Chapter Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse, Carl Åberg (2020)
Chapter Alessandra Rigolini, Jonas Gabrielsson, Mirian Izquierdo, Morten Huse (2019)
In this chapter we reflect on the ongoing megatrend of digitalization in relation to boards of directors. We define and discuss the digital transformation and its consequences for societies and corporations as well as how corporations cope with digitalization inside and outside the boardroom. Furthermore, we examine and discuss accountabilities and competencies for boards and board members in the digital era. The chapter concludes with an analysis of different layers in which digitalization and the digital transformation of society may influence boards and governance
Article Alessandra Rigolini, Morten Huse (2019)
We show unintended consequences of quota regulations to get women on boards. Board members may have diferent characteristics, and even among women, there are variations. We assume that the characteristics of the board members have an infuence on their contributions to boards, to businesses as well as to society. In this paper, we argue that diferent types of societal pressure to get women on boards have an infuence on the social capital characteristics of the women getting multiple board memberships. The paper is drawing on institutional theory and social capital theory, and we distinguish between mimetic, normative, and coercive types of pressure. Through a cluster analysis of 58 Italian “golden skirts”, we show that diferent types of societal pressure may lead to diferences in social capital characteristics. The study has implications for the ongoing international debate about women and diversity on boards, and we propose developing a pressure theory for getting women on boards.
Article Esther Solomon, Morten Huse (2019)
Relying on a sample of 841 respondents who are board members of Norwegian firms, this study applied Dr. Guttman’s Facet Theory along with nonmetric multidimensional scaling to propose and empirically test structural hypotheses about perceptions of boardroom dynamics. The application of this formal methodology to studying corporate governance processes offers unique insights into leadership dynamics and paradoxical tensions as board members experience them in the boardroom. A facet framework defining the content universe formed the basis for facet profile configurations expressing classes of boardroom dynamics. Results overall confirmed the structural hypotheses and the lawfulness of a radex structure representing boardroom processes. Three facets differentiated among classes of boardroom processes in terms of whether they represent opportunities or threats for cooperation, board asserting or acquiescing roles, and approaching or distancing orientations. These facets represented the qualitative differentiation and jointly played the polarizing role, while a fourth ordered facet on specificity played the modulator role. Director’s perceptions of shared leadership and monitoring comprise enabling orientations and are differentiated from inhibiting orientations that include dominating leadership and biases. The findings have implications for director’s motivation and ability to engage in their monitoring and resource provision roles, or alternatively, contribute to governance inertia.
Chapter Morten Huse (2019)
Management research has during recent years been subject to critical attention. There have been calls for redirections toward what matters most and toward scholarship with an impact. In this paper I present reflections about the future of scholarship. AOM (The Academy of Management) has become an important premise vendor for international management research. To embed suggestions for redirection of research, I analyzed these presidential addresses over twenty-five years. I found that many of them have raised similar concerns. The AOM presidents have argued that management research suffers from a too narrow view of scholarship, theory and practice are not connected, and an audit culture with negative consequences. The presidents of AOM all have a reflecting presidential address at the end of their presidential period. They typically address what they see as the most important issues or challenges for the AOM, for management research and for scholarship in general.
Article Aud Schoning, Axel Walther, Silke Machold, Morten Huse (2018)
Article Yongsun Paik, Gillian Warner-Søderholm, Morten Huse (2018)
Anthology Morten Huse (2018)
This Element shapes the discussion about corporate governance and boards of directors. The arena for boards and corporate governance is not static. In Boards, Governance and Value Creation (Cambridge 2007), Morten Huse presented knowledge about boards with a focus on behavioural perspectives. The present contribution reflects on what has occurred during recent years. It contributes to the literature around sustainable value creation in business and society. This Element brings an update of the content of the 2007 book and thus provides a resource for students and scholars – as well as for reflective practitioners.
Chapter Morten Huse (2018)
Chapter Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2017)
Chapter Cathrine Seierstad, Morten Huse (2017)
Chapter Alessandra Rigolini, Morten Huse (2017)
Article Hazel McLaughlin, Jo Silvester, Diana Bilimoria, Sophie Jane, Ruth Sealy, Kim Peters, Hannah Möltner, Morten Huse, Juliane Göke (2017)
Article Morten Huse (2016)
Chapter Morten Huse (2016)
Chapter Jonas Gabrielsson, Andrea Calabrò, Morten Huse (2016)
Article Cathrine Seierstad, Gillian Warner-Søderholm, Torchia Mariateresa, Morten Huse (2015)
Article Michela Iannotta, Mauro Gatti, Morten Huse (2015)
Chapter Morten Huse (2015)
Review article Alessandro Zattoni, Luca Gnan, Morten Huse (2015)
Article Luca Gnan, Daniela Montemerlo, Morten Huse (2015)
Article Wim Vordeckers, Anita van Gils, Jonas Gabrielsson, Diamanto Politis, Morten Huse (2014)
Chapter Morten Huse (2014)
Academic book Silke Machold, Morten Huse, Katrin Hansen, Marina Brogi (2013)
Chapter Morten Huse (2013)
Article Thilo Pukall, Andrea Calabrò, Morten Huse (2013)
Review article Morten Huse (2012)
Article Alessandro Zattoni, Luca Gnan, Morten Huse (2012)
Article Morten Huse, Truls Norby, Reidar Haugsrud (2012)
Article Alessandro Minichilli, Alessandro Zattoni, Sabina Nielsen, Morten Huse (2012)
Chapter Janicke Rasmussen, Morten Huse (2011)
Article Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò, Morten Huse (2011)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson, Alessandro Minichilli (2011)
En annen versjon av denne artikkelen er tidligre publisert i Burke and Cooper 2009: The Peak Performing Organizations, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-4517-3
Article Morten Huse, Robert Hoskisson, Alessandro Zattoni, Riccardo Vigano (2011)
Article Silke Machold, Morten Huse, Alessandro Minichilli, Mattias Nordqvist (2011)
Editorial Riccardo Vigano, Alessandro Zattoni, Robert Hoskisson, Morten Huse (2011)
Article Alessandro Minichilli, Morten Huse (2011)
Article Morten Huse (2011)
Editorial Trine Karlsen, Morten Huse (2011)
Article Michael Russ, Morten Huse (2011)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Article Sabina Nielsen, Morten Huse (2010)
Article Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò, Morten Huse, Marina Brogi (2010)
Article Silke Machold, Morten Huse (2010)
Article Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò, Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse, Sabina Nielsen (2010)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson (2010)
Chapter Morten Huse, Alessandro Minichilli, Margrethe Schøning (2009)
Article Amedeo Pugliese, Pieter-Jan Bezemer, Alessandro Zattoni, Morten Huse, Frans A.J. Van Den Bosch, Henk W. Volberda (2009)
Chapter Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse, Dorthe Eide (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson, Alessandro Minichilli (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse, Violina P. Rindova (2009)
Article Janicke Lilletvedt Rasmussen, Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter P. Zhang, Wim Voordeckers, Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2009)
Article Morten Huse, Sabina Tacheva Nielsen, Inger Marie Hagen (2009)
We present results from a study about women and employee-elected board members, and fill some of the gaps in the literature about their contribution to board effectiveness. The empirical data is from a unique data set of Norwegian firms. Board effectiveness is evaluated in relation to board control tasks including board CSR involvement. We found that the contributions of women and employee-elected board members varied depending on the board tasks studied. In the article we also explored the effects of the esteem of the women and employee-elected board members, and we used creative discussions in the boardroom as a mediating variable. Previous board research, including research about women and employee-elected directors, questions if the board members contribute to board effectiveness. The main message from this study is that it may be more important to ask how, rather than if, women and employee-elected board members contribute, and we need to open the black box of actual board behavior to explore how they may contribute.
Chapter Pingying Zhang, Wim Voordeckers, Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse, Anne Grethe Solberg (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2009)
Anthology Morten Huse, Arild I. Søland (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse (2009)
Article Hans van Ees, Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2009)
Chapter Morten Huse, Thomas Hoholm (2008)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson, Alessandro Minichilli (2008)
Article Morten Huse, Alessandro Zattoni (2008)
Chapter Morten Huse (2008)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson, Alessandro Minichilli (2008)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson, Alessandro Minichilli (2008)
Chapter Morten Huse (2008)
Article Thomas Hoholm, Morten Huse (2008)
Chapter Inger Marie Hagen, Morten Huse (2007)
Article Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse, Alessandro Minichilli (2007)
Article Alessandro Minichilli, Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2007)
Article Lorraine Uhlaner, Mike Wright, Morten Huse (2007)
Chapter Inger Marie Hagen, Morten Huse (2007)
Anthology Morten Huse (2006)
Article Morten Huse, Anne Grethe Solberg (2006)
Article Morten Huse (2005)
Article Morten Huse, Alessandro Minichilli, Margrethe Schøning (2005)
Article Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2005)
Article Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2005)
Article Morten Huse, D. Neubaum, Jonas Gabrielsson (2005)
Article Morten Huse (2005)
What is board accountability, and how is such accountability created? This response to Roberts, McNulty and Stiles suggests a framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of boards and corporate governance. The contribution of this framework is to develop a terminology that may help us accumulate. knowledge and provide directions for a research agenda. The consistent use of a terminology, the accumulation of knowledge and an accepted research agenda among a core group of scholar are some of the first steps in developing a promising research field with considerable potential to create actionable knowledge. The framework can help us sort some of the research, concepts and anecdotes that have been presented in efforts to open the black box of board research.
Chapter Zahra Shaker, D. Neubaum, Morten Huse (2005)
Article Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson (2005)
Chapter Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson (2004)
Chapter Morten Huse (2004)
Article Morten Huse (2004)
Chapter Morten Huse (2004)
Article Morten Huse (2003)
Chapter Morten Huse, Ole Gunnar Winsnes (2002)
Chapter Morten Huse, Ole Gunnar Winsnes (2002)
Chapter Vidar L. Haanes, Morten Huse, Morten Huse (2002)
Article Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2002)
Article Morten Huse, Violina P. Rindova (2001)
Article Odd Jarl Borch, Morten Huse, Morten Huse (1993)
Article Morten Huse (1990)
Interview Morten Huse, Raine Hermans (2022)
Interview Morten Huse, Natasa Briski (2022)
Feature article Morten Huse (2012)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Batia Ben-Hador, Galit Klein, Tracy Hopkins, Rosa yeh, Tom Lumpkin, Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Article Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Jose Maria Guibert (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Batia Ben-Hador, Galit Klein, Tracy Hopkins, Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2022)
Conference lecture Sabina Tasheva, Alessandro Zattoni, Alessandro Minichilli, Morten Huse (2020)
Lecture Morten Huse (2019)
Conference organized by BI on the International Women's Day
Conference lecture Hannah Moeltner, Morten Huse (2019)
Conference lecture Sabina Tacheva, Alessandro Minichilli, Alessandro Zattoni, Morten Huse (2019)
Report Morten Huse (2018)
The key findings of this Bulletin are: • Voluntary actions to get more women on boards did not work in Norway. A legal quota for gender balance was therefore implemented. Many countries have been influenced by the snowball that started rolling in Norway. • Challenges, characteristics, and contributions of the women becoming board members vary. They are influenced both by the national context and the national public policy instruments being applied. Efforts for getting women on boards must be adapted to national discourses and contextual factors. • Actual board behaviour influences the business case for women on boards. It is necessary to move beyond superficial accounts and take better account of ‘who the women are’. • Quotas are not enough for achieving gender equity, and societal sustainability and well-being. Quotas must be supplemented by other initiatives.
Article Eskil le Bruyn Goldeng, Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Carl Åberg, Max Bankewitz, Mirjam Knockert, Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Carl Åberg, Wei Shen, Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Alessandra Rigolini, Juliane Göke, Hannah Möltner (2017)
Abstract With a starting point in Sandberg’s ‘lean in’ approach, we studied national and international discourses about getting women on corporate boards. We wanted to reveal discourses that may have negative consequences for individuals, business and society. A multi-sited ethnographic study was used, and we followed the quota-debates in Norway, Italy, Germany, Spain and Slovenia. In this paper we first identify various feminist arguments and sort them in five main sets of gender codes. We then following sociological system theory observed how the arguments were coupled in different discourses. We found that not all discourses were constructive. Some of them could lead to negative consequences for women, businesses and societies. This is also the case for Sandberg’s approach. We suggested that her ‘lean in’ approach can be described as creative misunderstanding. Through our study we make an international contribution to women’s career advancement. Key words: Women’s career advancements, women on boards, sociological system theory, feminism, misunderstandings,
Lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Alessandra Rigolini, Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Juliane Göke, Morten Huse (2017)
Lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Lecture Morten Huse (2017)
Conference lecture Juliane Göke, Morten Huse, Hannah Möltner (2016)
Conference lecture Max Bankewitz, Sadi Kanadli, Morten Huse (2016)
Lecture Morten Huse (2016)
Conference lecture Juliane Göke, Johannes Brinkmann, Morten Huse (2016)
Conference lecture Juliane Göke, Morten Huse (2016)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2016)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2016)
Lecture Morten Huse (2016)
Conference lecture Sadi Kanadli, Max Bankewitz, Morten Huse (2016)
Report Mirian Izquierdo, Morten Huse, Hannah Möltner (2016)
España fue uno de los primeros países en establecer una normativa que contemplaba la igualdad de género en los consejos de administración de las empresas a través de la ley orgánica 3/2007 de 22 de marzo. A pesar de ello, la recomendación que establecía la ley para todas las grandes empresas de alcanzar el 40% de presencia del género menos representado en los Consejos, no incluía ninguna sanción. Como consecuencia de ello, España es en la actualidad uno de los grandes países de Europa con el menor porcentaje de mujeres en sus consejos. En este informe, se presentan sugerencias para incrementar el número de mujeres en los consejos de administración en las empresas españolas. La presente investigación presenta los resultados de un estudio empírico que se realizó desde el otoño de 2015 hasta la primavera de 2016. Los métodos usados han sido observaciones directas, entrevistas y encuestas realizadas a través de un cuestionario on-line. Las observaciones sobre otros países y las investigaciones anteriores se nutren de aportaciones de diversos estudios. Estas observaciones se presentan también en este informe, como una comparativa. Sobre la base de los resultados más sustanciales de la encuesta, los debates llevados a cabo en grupos organizados, las entrevistas realizadas, el escaso avance del enfoque voluntario, las exigencias del colectivo empresarial español por reflejar la realidad social y de los consumidores, así como de la necesidad de credibilidad, fiabilidad, gobernanza corporativa y competitividad, se concluye que: 1) Las cuotas son más rápidas y más sencillas que la presión informal para obtener resultados. Un enfoque flexible podría llevarse a cabo para avanzar igualmente, pero exigiría en todo caso elaborar una amenaza relativa a una eventual adopción de cuotas para poder obtener resultados. Para liderar el cambio, se debe crear de forma temporal una estrategia concreta dirigida por una estructura política con la eventual ayuda de un comité ad hoc o un organismo rector. 2) La comunidad empresarial tiene que abrir los ojos y alinearse para ver las ventajas de la inclusión de mujeres en los consejos al ser una fuente de talento amplia y diversa. 3) Existe una necesidad de coordinar los esfuerzos de los diferentes interesados para lograr y completar el progreso. Esto no puede hacerse a través de las organizaciones ya existentes de mujeres, sino a través de la cooperación entre políticos, empresas y líderes (hombres y mujeres) por medio de una estructura que coordine la estrategia y su implementación. 4) Las propuestas para la promoción de mujeres en los consejos de administración deben complementarse con el desarrollo de condiciones necesarias para que los consejos de administración que creen valor, en particular enfocadas hacia la formación en Consejos de administración de sus miembros. Palabras clave: Mujeres en los consejos, España, argumentos, cuota, aprendizaje, creación de valor
Conference lecture Cathrine Seierstad, Patricia Gabaldon, Morten Huse, Stefan Gröschl (2016)
Lecture Morten Huse (2016)
Lecture Morten Huse (2016)
Report Mirian Izquierdo, Morten Huse, Hannah Möltner (2016)
Spain was one of the first countries in Europe to set out gender balance legislation on corporate board by the organic law 3/2007 of 22nd of March. The objective was the attainment of effective equality of women and men. However, when referring to boards of directors the recommendation set out in the law for big companies to attain a 40% of the least represented gender by 2015 did not contain any sanctioning. Neither has been the case of most recent legislation on this issue: neither the Law 31/2014, of the 3rd of December, amending Capital Corporate Act in its art.529 quindicies.3, b, setting out the free willing yearly imposed quote, (flexi-quote) nor Recommendation 14 of the Good Corporate Governance Code of the CNMV , lowering the threshold to a 30% by 2020. As a consequence Spain is at present the large European country with the lowest percentage of women on boards. When Professor Morten Huse asked me to help him identifying main actors and drivers and support him in his research, I told him my opinion. In Spain there are important misconceptions and barriers; so that it would be needed to make a preliminary study of those, before starting a research as the one developed in other countries. I then manifested him that I would design a strategy, having a survey as a starting point, to discover all these issues. The survey should help us better understand the reasons why developments in Spain are slower than in the rest of the biggest countries of the European Union. Having the survey as starting point, we made over thirty interviews, two panel discussions related to recruitment methods and value creation issues, and we held several meetings with groups of different stakeholders of this debate: - listed companies - board members - foundations related to good governance, company transparency, corporate social responsibility - head hunters - women associations - civil servants concerned by this debate - members of Parliament - politicians - consultancy firms - business schools - journalists The path has not been easy, since interviewees were often reluctant to freely speak about the topic on some occasions or clearly mentioned they were not interested in taking part in it. There was a clear mismatch between the interest in knowing the results, which was relatively important, and the disposal to contribute to the research. The journey to understand the Spanish situation has been demanding; sometimes requiring insistence, other times patience and in general with a considerable degree of flexibility. We have now arrived to an end of our project and will be able to give some conclusions. Hopefully, we will contribute to various stakeholders by shedding some light on how to progress in empowering women, building a more sustainable society and contributing to create more diverse and competitive corporations.
Conference lecture Cathrine Seierstad, Patricia Gabaldon, Morten Huse, Stefan Gröschl (2016)
Article Cathrine Seierstad, Silvija Seres, Morten Huse (2015)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Conference lecture Max Bankewitz, Morten Huse (2015)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Conference lecture Max Bankewitz, Morten Huse (2015)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Therese N Tørlen, Cathrine Seierstad (2015)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2015)
Article Morten Huse (2014)
Lecture Morten Huse (2014)
This major event brings together leading thinkers and experts to explore the challenges of targets and quotas for Government & Employers. We will set out the International and European context and learn from the Norway experience. Drawing on the latest research findings, we will hear views from Academia and learn from leading employers how they have met the challenges and more importantly, how they are holding individuals to account! Plus Networking opportunities and interactive Workshops. This is a fantastic opportunity for employers to understand the issues and decide the best approach for their organisation. Speakers: Charlotte Hogg,COO, Bank of England Rt Hon David Blunkett, MP Professor Morten Huse, Reinhard-Mohn-Chair, University of Witten/Herdecke & BI Norwegian Business School Helena Morrisey, CEO Newton, Founder 30% Club, Opportunity Now Chair Maggie Stilwell, Partner, EY Steps: Workshop leaders Karen M Fortunato, Company Secretary & General Counsel, Santander UK plc Baroness Glenys Thornton Confirmed members for the panel debate are: Paul Deemer, Equality and Diversity, NHS Employers Morten Huse, Reinhard-Mohn-Chair, University of Witten/Herdecke & BI Norwegian Business School Trevor Phillips OBE, enei Trustee and former Chair of EHRC Maggie Stilwell, Partner, EY Charlotte Sweeney, Diversity consultant and reviewer of headhunters' code of conduct
Conference lecture Esther Solomon, Morten Huse (2014)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2014)
Lecture Cathrine Seierstad, Morten Huse, Gillian Warner-Søderholm, Mariateresa Torchia, lena Willems (2014)
Article Morten Huse (2014)
Conference lecture Michela Ianotta, Morten Huse (2014)
Lecture Morten Huse (2014)
Conference lecture Cathrine Seierstad, Morten Huse, Geraldine Healy (2014)
Article Morten Huse (2014)
Article Morten Huse (2013)
Book chapter Morten Huse, Merete Lütken, Nini Høegh Nergaard, Thorhild Widvey, Ingvild Myhre (2013)
Article Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Book chapter Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Article Morten Huse (2013)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Article Morten Huse, Cathrine Seierstad (2013)
A snowball has started to roll in Norway as a consequence of the introduction of a gender balance law. This snowball has triggered a global avalanche, and the world is looking to Norway. Below, Morten Huse and Cathrine Seierstad question what can be done to increase the number of women on boards, and consider the background and consequences of Norwegian gender balance law on corporate boards.
Article Morten Huse (2013)
Introduction Morten Huse, Marina Brogi (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Lecture Morten Huse (2013)
Article Morten Huse (2012)
Article Morten Huse (2012)
Article Morten Huse (2012)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2012)
Article Morten Huse (2012)
Conference lecture Luca Gnan, Morten Huse, Alessandro Zattoni (2012)
Lecture Morten Huse (2012)
Conference lecture Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò, Morten Huse, Michele Morner (2012)
Lecture Morten Huse (2012)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2012)
Article Morten Huse (2011)
Textbook Randi Ib Lund, Morten Huse (2011)
Article Morten Huse (2011)
Article Morten Huse (2011)
Article Morten Huse (2011)
Book Morten Huse (2011)
Article Morten Huse (2011)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2011)
Book chapter Janicke Rasmussen, Morten Huse (2011)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò (2010)
Conference lecture Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Andrea Calabrò, Mariateresa Torchia (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Article Morten Huse (2010)
Book Morten Huse (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Sabina Tacheva Nielsen (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Andrea Calabrò, Donata Mussolino (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Article Morten Huse (2009)
Conference lecture Jonas Gabrielsson, Morten Huse (2008)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Mattias Nordqvist, Alessandro Minichilli (2008)
Conference lecture Wim Voordeckers, Anita van Gils, Morten Huse, Jonas Gabrielsson, Diamanto Politis (2008)
Report Thomas Hoholm, Morten Huse (2008)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Sabina Nielsen, Alessandro Minichilli, Alessandro Zattoni (2008)
Conference lecture Morten Huse, Donata Musolino (2008)
Article Morten Huse, Alessandro Minichilli, Mattias Nordqvist, Alessandro Zattoni (2008)
Book Susan Vinnicombe, Val Singh, Ronald Burke, Diana Bilimoria, Morten Huse (2008)
Report Thomas Sellevoll, Morten Huse, Cathrine Hansen (2007)
This report is one of several research contributions which are the outcomes of “The Value Creating Board” research program conducted at The Norwegian School of Management BI from 2001 to 2007. The report is a descriptive presentation of data from three surveys, directed at CEOs, board chairpersons and board members in Norwegian firms, collected through questionnaires during the fall 2005 and winter/spring 2006. It considers boards across both small, medium sized and large firms.
Report Morten Huse, Margrethe Schøning (2005)
Report Lise Haalien, Morten Huse (2005)
Report Jon Erland Lervik, Morten Huse, Cathrine Hansen, Jon Erik Svendsen (2005)
Book Davide Ravasi, Morten Huse, Guido Corbetta (2004)
Book Morten Huse, Cathrine Hansen (2003)
Book Morten Huse, Cathrine Hansen (2002)
Conference lecture Cathrine Hansen, Morten Huse (2002)
Book Morten Huse, Cathrine Hansen (2002)
Report Allan Sande, Hallgeir Aalbu, Morten Huse (1996)
| Year | Academic Department | Degree |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Norwegian School of Economics | Ph.D Dr. Oecon. |
| 1985 | HAS Høyere Avdelings studium NHH Bergen | Other |
| 1984 | Various (University of Oslo, MF, ForsikringsAkademiet, University of Bergen) | Other |
| 1976 | Norwegian School of Economics, NHH | Master of Science in Business |
| Year | Employer | Job Title |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 - Present | Comillas University | International visiting professor |
| 2022 - Present | University of Vaasa | International visiting professor |
| 2021 - Present | BI Norwegian Business School | Professor emeritus |
| 2002 - 2020 | BI Norwegian Business School | Professor |
| 2019 - 2019 | University of Pisa | Visiting scholar |
| 2015 - 2017 | University of Witten/Herdecke | Univ-Professor and Research Chair of Management and Governance |
| 2012 - 2015 | Witten/Herdecke University | Reinhard Mohn Chair of Management and Governance |
| 2002 - 2013 | Hanken School of Economics | Guest Researcher / Guest Professor |
| 2006 - 2011 | University of Rome, Tor Vergata | International visiting professor |
| 2007 - 2010 | Magna Graecia University | International visiting professor |
| 2006 - 2010 | Federico II University | International visiting professor |
| 2001 - 2006 | Bocconi University | International visiting professor |
| 1997 - 2002 | Stiftelsen Kirkeforskning | Researcher |
| 1996 - 2001 | University of Lund / Halmstad University | Professor |
| 1996 - 2000 | University of Jyväskylä | Visiting professor |
| 1989 - 1997 | Nordland Research Institute | PhD Candidate / Researcher |
| 1988 - 1994 | Bodø University College | Assistant Professor |
| 1986 - 1988 | Bonitas Management Consulting (Arthur Young) | Director & Partner |
| 1986 - 1987 | SAS International Hotels | Director of Finance, Deputy CEO |
| 1981 - 1986 | Norges Brannkasse/Uni Forsikring | Miscellaneous |
| 1983 - 1984 | Norwegian Church Aid | Training Manager |
| 1978 - 1981 | Church of Norway | Research |
| 1978 - 1978 | Norwegian School of Economics | Research Assistant |
| 1972 - 1973 | Hellen Elementary School, Bergen | Teacher |