Lars Olsen
Professor
Deans, Department of Marketing
Professor
Deans, Department of Marketing
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2025)
Markedsføring er ikke bare en akademisk disiplin – det er først og fremst en ledelsespraksis. Som Jan-Benedict Steenkamp, redaktør for verdens mest innflytelsesrike markedsføringstidsskrift Journal of Marketing, uttrykte det i et LinkedIn-innlegg i mai 2025 (min oversettelse): «Selv den beste forskningen er uinteressant om den ikke er relevant for praktikeren.» Dette synet understreker hvorfor markedsføring må knyttes tett til virksomhetenes hverdag og verdiskaping. Målet med all markedsføring – uansett teoretisk ståsted eller praktisk metode – er å bidra til at forretningen lykkes. Gode finansielle resultater henger ofte sammen med god markedsføring. Og god markedsføring er sjelden tilfeldig. Den bygger på en solid forståelse av markedet, på analyser og planlegging, og på evnen til å ta kvalifiserte beslutninger. Samtidig krever markedsføring en kreativ dimensjon – en kunstnerisk intuisjon – som kan gjøre det analytisk gode til noe ekstraordinært. Det er nettopp i dette spennet mellom kunnskap og kreativitet at markedsføring blir både faglig spennende og strategisk viktig. Men markedsføring handler også om mye mer enn kampanjer, merkevarer og kanaler. Strategisk markedsføring i dag er dypt forankret i forståelsen av endringer i teknologi, samfunn og forbrukeratferd. Det handler om å se muligheter og utfordringer i samtidens komplekse landskap – og om å tilpasse seg i takt med utviklingen. I dette nummeret av Magma løfter vi frem bredden i markedsføring. Vi åpner opp for nye perspektiver og praksiser innen markedsføringsfaget. Vi ser på hvordan lojalitetsprogrammer har blitt avanserte plattformer for kundedialog, hvordan kunstig intelligens endrer måten vi utvikler innhold og møter kunder på, og hvordan samfunnsansvar, kjønn og prising påvirker merkeverdier og forbrukertillit. Til sammen viser artiklene at strategisk markedsføring ikke er én metode eller én vei – men en kontinuerlig balansegang mellom innsikt, innovasjon og forretningsforståelse.
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Ioannis Pappas, Luk Warlop (2022)
Purpose –Brand managers can choose among two fundamentally different brand positioning strategies. One is a broad brand strategy, focusing on many favorable brand associations. The other is a narrow brand strategy, focusing on just a few and thus more mentally accessible associations. Building on associative memory theory, the current article examines which of these brand positioning strategies performs better under dynamic market conditions. Design/methodology/approach – Three experiments test the effect of brand positioning strategy on memory accessibility and competitive brand performance. Study 1 tests how brand strategy (broad vs. narrow) affects defensive brand performance. Study 2 tests how broad vs. narrow brands perform differently in a brand extension scenario (offensive brand performance). Study 3 uses real brands and situation-based attributes as stimuli in a defensive scenario. Findings – The results show that a narrow brand positioning strategy leads to a competitive advantage. Narrow brands with fewer and more accessible associations resist new competitors more easily and have higher brand extension acceptance than do broad brands. Research implications – The article shows how to use accessibility as evidence of associative strength and test how accessibility influences competitive brand performance in a controlled experimental context. Practical implications – Brand managers would benefit from a narrow brand positioning strategy in accordance with the USP school of thought used by many marketing practitioners. Originality – The paper demonstrates that narrow brand positioning performs better than broad brand positioning in dynamic markets, and to our knowledge is the first to do so.
Article Morten Erichsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2021)
Annonsører og reklamebyråer bør kontinuerlig søke å effektivisere sine reklamekampanjer. Vår undersøkelse viser at A/B-testing av reklame i digitale medier på mange måter har erstattet pretesting av reklame i disse kanalene. Vi hevder at med inntog av nye og mer avanserte metoder som kunstig intelligens (AI) og nevromåling bør pretesting av reklame i digitale medier få mer oppmerksomhet. Sammen med A/B-testing kan dette bidra til å gjøre reklamekampanjer enda mer effektive. Vi rapporterer funn fra en kvalitativ undersøkelse der vi dybdeintervjuer 19 personer i bransjen. Våre funn gir holdepunkter for at pretesting av reklame gjennomføres i svært liten grad i Norge, til tross for at de fleste respondentene har en positiv holdning til pretesting. Funnene viser også at respondentene ikke er godt nok kjent med nye metoder for pretesting av reklame, og at svært få har tatt dem i bruk. Et viktig formål med denne artikkelen er derfor å bidra til at flere blir oppmerksom på nye metoder for pretesting av reklame og tar i bruk disse metodene sammen med A/B-testing for å optimalisere reklamen.
Editorial Jon Bingen Sande, Lars Erling Olsen (2019)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Et viktig mål i merkeledelse er å posisjonere merket med relevante og unike assosiasjoner i kundenes hukommelse. Styrken på merkeassosiasjonene – hvor nært en assosiasjon er koblet til merket i hukommelsen – er svært viktig i merkeledelse. Det er imidlertid en utfordring å finne gode metoder for å måle assosiasjonsstyrke. Forskning og eksisterende praksis i markedsanalyse tilbyr få forslag til hvordan man kan måle assosiasjonsstyrke på en korrekt praktisk og teoretisk måte. Denne artikkelen tilbyr en løsning på dette problemet og foreslår måling av reaksjonstid basert på en trestegs analyseprosedyre. Metoden er basert på faktisk kognitiv tilgjengelighet av assosiasjoner i kundenes hukommelse, og hvordan denne tilgjengeligheten slår ut på individuelle reaksjonstider. Konkret produserer denne metoden forskjeller i rapportert hastighet (i millisekunder) mellom assosiasjoner, der kortere reaksjonstider indikerer en sterkere merkeassosiasjon. To studier benyttes for å illustrere metoden. I den første studien testes selskapsassosiasjoner til en stor norsk merkevare som gjennom responstider får innsikt i hvilke assosiasjoner som er sterkest koblet til merket. I den andre studien illustreres metoden ved å teste en rekke ulike sjokolademerkers merkeposisjoner. Resultatene viser at Kvikk Lunsj har den sterkeste posisjonen blant de ulike sjokolademerkene målt i reaksjonstid. Sammenfattet gir disse to studiene gode eksempler på hvordan den foreslåtte metoden kan benyttes, analyseres og rapporteres i praksis.
Chapter Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Editorial Lars Erling Olsen (2017)
Article Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Conference abstract Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Editorial Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Article Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Article Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen, Kevin Lane Keller (2015)
Chapter Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Chapter Lars Erling Olsen (2014)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2014)
Article Leif Egil Hem, Nina M. Iversen, Lars Erling Olsen (2014)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Tarje Gaustad (2014)
Article Even Johan Lanseng, Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Sander Sværi, Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Even Johan Lanseng (2012)
Brand placements have become popular as an alternative brand communication tool for many companies. Previous research on brand placements has mainly considered the communication effects of brands placed in television programmes, films and computer games. To our knowledge, only one recently published article has looked into brand placements in narrative fiction. Hence, the current article is among the first papers to study the effects of brand placements in narrative fiction, and among the first papers to investigate consumers’ attitudes towards such placements. The basic proposition is that brand prominence (high plot integration versus low plot integration) is positively related to favourable attitudes towards the brand. Additionally, we propose that plot integration interacts with reader involvement in the text, thereby increasing the importance of visible and dominant brands placed in the text for high-involvement consumers. An experiment manipulating plot integration and reader involvement supports our proposed main and interaction effects.
Article Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2011)
Article Karl Fredrik Lund, Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Advertisers face several message options when they position a new brand in well-established categories. Functional benefit claims versus experiential claims represent two options. Functional claims focus on tangible attributes and benefits, whereas experiential claims focus on promises of experiences the consumer should expect from the new brand. In this paper, we present the results from two experiments testing the persuasiveness of ads promising experience versus the persuasiveness of ads promising functional benefits of a new entrant. In the first experiment, we found that involvement moderates the effect of claim type on attitude toward a new category entrant in retail banking. This finding was replicated and extended in a second experiment using ski resorts as the context. Our findings suggest that functional benefit claims outperform experiential claims in high-involvement situations and that the strength of message arguments can be just as important as the framing choice. The research also shows that the two advertising claim types elicit different cognitive responses: functional claims trigger mostly semantic memory, whereas experiential claims trigger more episodic memories.
Chapter Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2010)
Brand extensions are attractive to companies because they provide an opportunity to take advantage of existing brand names when entering into new product categories. However, at times brand managers identify growth categories beyond the reach of their brands. In these cases, the current literature recommends introducing a new brand name, even though it is acknowledged that this strategy carries substantial financial risk. This paper proposes an alternative approach, and introduces the conceptual idea that brands may be stretched farther using a series of intervening brand extension – sequential extensions – bridging the gap between the parent brand and the target category. Keywords: brand extension, sequential extensions, associative networks
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Conference abstract Even Johan Lanseng, Lars Erling Olsen (2008)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Nina M. Iversen, Leif Egil Hem (2008)
Article Bendik M. Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2007)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2005)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Leif Egil Hem (2004)
Article Lars E. Olsen, Leif Egil Hem (2004)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Participation in media Alexander Farestvedt Hem, Lars Erling Olsen (2025)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen (2025)
Feature article Håvard Huse, Lars Erling Olsen (2024)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen, Eirik Haus (2023)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen, Eirik Haus (2022)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen (2020)
Feature article Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2019)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Adrian Peretz (2018)
Feature article Roy Elvegård, Line Lervik-Olsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2018)
Feature article Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Feature article Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Feature article Leif Egil Hem, Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Feature article Leif Egil Hem, Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Commentary Lars Erling Olsen (2025)
- Pretesting av reklame er en av bransjens evige gjengangere. La oss ta debatten et steg videre, skriver Lars Erling Olsen i denne kommentaren.
Book Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2025)
Report Eirik Haus, Lars Erling Olsen (2024)
Book Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2024)
Book Eirik Haus, Lars Erling Olsen (2022)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2021)
Article Morten Erichsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2021)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2021)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2020)
Conference lecture Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2020)
Conference lecture Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2020)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2019)
Article Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2019)
Article Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2019)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Luk Warlop (2019)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Brand association strength – how closely a brand association is connected to the brand in consumer memory – is of vital importance in brand management. However, finding practical methods in measuring association strength is a problem for many companies. Previous research offers few suggestions on how to measure association strength based on a theoretically and conceptually consistent approach. Traditionally brand association strength is measured in qualitative research, but these results can be very misleading. To tackle this problem, the current paper suggests using response time latencies combined with a three-step analysis procedure to measure strength. This quantitative method is based on the consumer’s actual cognitive accessibility of brand associations, offers more theoretically valid results and is easy to use for brand managers. Two studies are reported to illustrate the methodology and show how brand association strength could be measured, analyzed and reported.
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2018)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Tor W. Andreassen (2017)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2017)
Book Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2017)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2017)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2017)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Book Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2016)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Conference lecture Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2016)
Conference lecture Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Conference lecture Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Conference lecture Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2015)
Commentary Håvard Hansen, Lars Erling Olsen (2014)
Commentary Adrian Peretz, Håvard Hansen, Lars Erling Olsen (2014)
Lecture Lars Erling Olsen (2014)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik M. Samuelsen, Tarje Gaustad (2014)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2013)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2013)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2013)
Conference poster Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2013)
Conference poster Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2013)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2013)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2013)
Conference lecture Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2013)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2013)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2013)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Conference lecture Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2012)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2011)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Book Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Adrian Peretz, Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Conference lecture Sander Sværi, Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2010)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2010)
Brand extensions are attractive to companies because they provide an opportunity to take advantage of existing brand names when entering into new product categories. However, at times brand managers identify growth categories beyond the reach of their brands. In these cases, the current literature recommends introducing a new brand name, even though it is acknowledged that this strategy carries substantial financial risk. This paper proposes an alternative approach, and introduces the conceptual idea that brands may be stretched farther using a series of intervening brand extension – sequential extensions – bridging the gap between the parent brand and the target category. Keywords: brand extension, sequential extensions, associative networks
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2010)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2009)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2009)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Even Johan Lanseng, H Baalerud, H Holtmoen (2009)
Conference lecture Bendik Meling Samuelsen, Lars Erling Olsen (2009)
Article Lars Erling Olsen, Adrian Peretz (2008)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2008)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2007)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2007)
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Nina M. Iversen, Leif Egil Hem (2007)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2007)
Conference lecture Leif Egil Hem, Nina M. Iversen, Lars Erling Olsen (2007)
Textbook Adrian Peretz, Lars E. Olsen, Bendik M. Samuelsen (2007)
Lærebok i Merkevareldelse - spesielt tilpasset norske studenter på Bachelornivå og profesjonsmarkedet. Utstrakt bruk av norske eksempler og norsk terminologi.
Conference lecture Lars Erling Olsen, Bendik Meling Samuelsen (2007)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2006)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2006)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2006)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2006)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Article Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
Article Leif Egil Hem, Lars Erling Olsen (2004)
| Year | Academic Department | Degree |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | BI Norwegian Business School | PhD |
| 2003 | Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) | M.B.A. |
| 1999 | Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) | Bachelor in Economics and Business Administration |
| Year | Employer | Job Title |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 - Present | BI Norwegian Business School | Dean Executive |
| 2018 - 2022 | BI Norwegian Business School | Dean Bachelor |
| 2013 - 2017 | Kristiania University College (Høyskolen Kristiania) | Professor |
| 2012 - 2017 | Kristiania University College (Høyskolen Kristiania) | Head of Department, Department of Marketing |
| 2009 - 2013 | Kristiania University College (Høyskolen Kristiania) | Associate Professor |
| 2006 - 2009 | BI Norwegian Business School | Research Scholar |
| 2004 - 2006 | Norwegian School of Economics (NHH) | Research Scholar |
| 2000 - 2004 | Mills AS | Brand Manager |