Ansattprofil

Ansgar Zerfass

Professor II - Institutt for kommunikasjon og kultur

Bilde av Ansgar Zerfass

Biografi

Ansgar Zerfass, born 1965, is Professor in Communication and Leadership (II) at BI Norwegian Business School in Oslo, Norway, since 2013. He is also Professor and Chair in Strategic Communication at the Institute of Communication and Media Studies at the University of Leipzig, Germany. He teaches within the Master of Management program Communication for Leaders at BI and is involved in various research activities at the department.

Dr. Zerfass studied business administration and communication science at the University of Erlangen-Nueremberg, Bavaria, and graduated in management (Dipl.-Kfm.). He started his academic career as a research associate with Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. mult. Horst Steinmann at the Chair of Strategic Management at the same university and gained a doctorate in business administration (Dr. rer. pol) summa cum laude. Afterwards, he worked in practice for 10 years in the fields of corporate communications and political consulting. During that time, he held an executive management position at MFG Baden-Württemberg, the center of excellence of the federal state for information technology and media. At the same time, he achieved a Habilitation (academic lecture qualification/second doctorate) in communication science at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg under the mentorship of Prof. Winfried Schulz.

Services: Currently, he acts as Editor of the International Journal of Strategic Communication (Routledge Publishers, USA), Past President of the EUPRERA European Public Relations Education and Research Association, Brussels, Academic Advisor of the Corporate Communication Cluster Vienna (CCCV), Vienna, Austria, Plank Scholar at the Plank Center for Leadership in Public Relations at the University of Alabama, USA, Publisher of the multilingual knowledge portal communicationcontrolling.de, as well as Managing Director of the Academic Society for Corporate Management and Communication, which bundles the engagement of more than 35 global companies and various universities for knowledge transfer and research funding in the field of corporate communications. He is a member of ICA, ECREA, EUPRERA, DGPuK, DPRG, and EBEN/DNWE.

Dr. Zerfass has published 33 books and more than 300 journal articles, book chapters, and study reports papers in several languages so far. He runs a large number of empirical projects, for example as lead researcher of the annual European Communication Monitor, the largest transnational study on strategic communication in more than 40 countries (since 2007), as initiator of the Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor and as coordinator of the multi-year research program Value Creating Communication across several universities.

Publications
Please see Zerfass' profile page at Universität Leipzig.

Scientific awards
2016: Top Paper Award, EUPRERA Annual Conference, Groningen/Amsterdam
2016: Impact Award of the Journal of Communication Management / CCI Conference, New York
2016: Top Paper Award, International Public Relations Research Conference, USA
2016: Koichi Yamamura International Strategic Communication Award, IPRRC
2015: Jackson Jackson & Wagner Award, PRSA Foundation, Atlanta
2014: Pathfinder Award, Institute for Public Relations, New York
2014: Top Paper Award, EUPRERA Annual Conference, Brussels
2014: Koichi Yamamura International Strategic Communication Award, IPRRC
2013: Top Paper Award, International Public Relations Research Conference, USA
2013: Jackson Sharpe Award, Institute for Public Relations, USA
2012: Top Paper Award, EUPRERA Annual Conference, Istanbul
2012: Top Paper Award, International Public Relations Research Conference, USA
2011: Jackson-Sharpe Award, Institute for Public Relations, USA
1997: Ludwig-Schunk-Prize for Economic Science, University of Giessen
1995: Albert-Oeckl-Prize, German Public Relations Society (DPRG), Bonn
1995: PhD Award, University of Erlangen-Nueremberg
1989: Award of the Hermann-Weiler-Foundation, Nuremberg

Awards for communication campaigns
2010: PR Report Award "Innovative PR-Strategy"
2009: Federal Award for University Communication, BMBF/HINB
2005: German Multimedia Award
2000: German Public Relations Award (Deutscher PR-Preis)

Personal Awards
2010: Most innovative PR Researcher in Germany (newsaktuell/dpa)
2005: "PR head of the year" of the year in Germany (DPRG)

Awards for theses
Several advisees of Dr. Zerfass have received awards for their graduate theses in Germany or Europe:
2016: Master Thesis Award, EUPRERA (best graduate thesis in Europe)
2016: Best Student Paper Award, IPRRC 2016, Miami
2015: Master Thesis Award, EUPRERA (best graduate thesis in Europe)
2012: Albert Oeckl Award, German Public Relations Association (DPRG)
2012: Young Researcher Award, German Association of Press Spokespersons (BdP)
2011: Digital Communication Award (best graduate thesis on digital PR in Europe)
2010: Young Researcher Award, German Association of Press Spokespersons (BdP)
2010: Gold Award "Student of the Year", PR Report / PR Week Germany
2009: Young Researcher Award, German Association of Press Spokespersons (BdP)
2007: Young Researcher Award, German Association of Press Spokespersons (BdP)

Current research fields
Corporate Communications, Communication of medium-sized companies, Non-Profit Communication, Financial Communication, PR-Research, Online Communication, Reputation/Brand/Trust, Communication Controlling/ Evaluation

Publikasjoner

Ziegele, Daniel & Zerfass, Ansgar (2024)

The Evolution of Communication Consulting: A Long-Term Comparison of Service Quality in Strategic Communication

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2024.2365692 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Communication leaders and their teams are seldom able to handle the broad range of challenges within their area of responsibility by themselves. They rely on agencies as an external workbench and as specialists for new or seldom used practices. More importantly, they seek advice from communication consultants to understand challenges, and to identify opportunities for action. The increasing demand for such services has pushed prices and intensified the debate about their quality. Surprisingly, research on communication consulting and its quality is sparse. The first empirical studies were conducted just 10 years ago. In light of dynamic industry developments, the question arises regarding how the understanding and perceptions of communication consulting quality has evolved. To this end, a comparative study surveyed a total of 422 communication agencies in 2013 and 2023 on the relevance, factors, assurance, and showcasing of consulting quality. The results reveal that the importance of consulting quality is still high, but underlying conditions and implementation of quality have changed considerably. As the first in-depth and long-term exploration of this phenomenon, this research helps to shed light on a highly relevant but underexplored facet of strategic communication. It informs practice and offers numerous starting points for future research.

Tench, Ralph; Verčič, Dejan, Zerfass, Ansgar, Moreno, Angeles & Verhoeven, Piet (2023)

Komunikacijska odličnost: Kako razvijati, upravljati in voditi izjemno komuniciranje (Prev. P. Kofol)

Tench, Ralph; Verčič, Dejan, Zerfass, Ansgar, Moreno, Angeles & Verhoeven, Piet (2023)

Izvrsnost komunikacije: kako razviti, upravljati i voditi izuzetne komunikacije (Transl. L. Aškić)

Nothhaft, Howard & Zerfass, Ansgar (2023)

Public relations in a postdisciplinary world: On the impossibility of establishing a constitutive PR theory within the tribal struggles of applied communication disciplines

, s. 247- 265.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Brockhaus, Jana (2023)

Digital corporate communication and digital transformation of communication functions and organizations

, s. 238- 252.

Moreno, Angeles; Zerfass, Ansgar, Fuentes-Lara, Cristina, Verčič, Dejan, Zurro-Anton, Noelia, Verhoeven, Piet & Tench, Ralph (2023)

Excelencia en comunicación. Cómo desarrollar, dirigir y liderar comunicaciones excepcionales

Zerfass, Ansgar & Link, Jeanne (2023)

Business models for communication departments: a comprehensive approach to analyzing, explaining and innovating communication management in organizations

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-02-2023-0027 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

The question of whether and how communication departments contribute to organizational value creation has rarely been addressed in research. Such evidence is crucial, however, as communications compete internally with other functions (e.g. marketing and human resources (HR)) for budgets and staff. This article fills the gap by applying the business model concept, an established approach from management theory and practice, to communication units.

Brockhaus, Jana; Buhmann, Alexander & Zerfass, Ansgar (2022)

Digitalization in corporate communications: understanding the emergence and consequences of CommTech and digital infrastructure

28(2) Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-03-2022-0035 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Purpose This article studies the digitalization of corporate communications and the emergence of communication technology (CommTech). The authors show communicators' expectations regarding digitalization, gauge the current level of digitalization across communication departments and agencies and examine the effectiveness of strategic approaches to manage digitalization. Design/methodology/approach The authors conceptualize the phenomenon of CommTech and propose a framework for studying CommTech's emergence and consequences by combining (1) recent theorizing on digitalization in corporate communications, (2) the concept of digital maturity from information systems research and (3) a socio-technical approach to analyze the development of work systems. The authors apply this framework in a quantitative study (n = 2,664) among communication practitioners from 46 countries. Findings While digitalization of both communication activities and the underlying support infrastructure is seen as critically important among communicators, a large fraction of communication departments and agencies are still assessed as digitally immature. Further, data reveal the relevance of different (technology, tasks, structure and people) dimensions of digitalization strategies and the influence of such strategies on the digital maturity of communications. Practical implications The framework and empirical instruments developed in this study help practitioners to uncover and evaluate the level of digital maturity of communication departments and agencies. This allows to identify current challenges and future opportunities for improvement. Originality/value The authors propose a concise definition for the much-debated concept of CommTech and develop a new theoretical framework for understanding CommTech's emergence and consequences in the profession. This empirical work constitutes the first large-scale study on the digital maturity of communication departments and agencies.

Brockhaus, Jana & Zerfass, Ansgar (2022)

Strengthening the role of communication departments: A framework for positioning communication departments at the top of and throughout organizations

27(1) , s. 53- 70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2021-0021 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Purpose Corporate communications is often less successful when it is competing for influence with neighboring functions such as marketing or sales within organizations. This article addresses the internal positioning of communication departments by developing a conceptual framework which helps to understand, analyze and optimize their standing in organizations. Design/methodology/approach The research is based on a literature review across several disciplines (e.g. organizational communication, strategic management) and supported by 26 qualitative in-depth interviews with board members, executives and communicators in a global industry company. By combining the theoretical and empirical insights, a framework for positioning communication departments within organizations was developed. Findings The framework depicts seven strategies (e.g. expectation and impression management, supporting ambassadors from other departments) and three spheres of influence (organizational integration, internal perceptions and social capital) to strengthen the position of corporate communications. Research limitations/implications The conceptual framework has been supported by one case study so far, and future research may further develop and verify it by applying it to a larger number of companies in different industries. Practical implications Practitioners can use the framework as an analytical tool to reflect the current situation in their organization and identify opportunities for strengthening it. Originality/value This article introduces a novel view in the academic debate about the role and influence of corporate communications. It establishes a framework that helps to identify different drivers and strategies, and lays ground for future research.

Ziegele, Daniel; Kurtze, H & Zerfass, Ansgar (2022)

Zwischen Aufbruch und Konvention. Grundlagen und Grenzen virtueller Stakeholder-Dialoge in der strategischen Kommunikation von Organisationen

Zerfass, Ansgar (2022)

Lobbying und Public Affairs

Hoffmann, Christian Pieter; Schiereck, Dirk & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Handbuch Investor Relations und Finanzkommunikation

Zerfass, Ansgar; Buhmann, Alexander, Tench, Ralph, Verčič, Dejan & Moreno, Angeles (2021)

European Communication Monitor 2021. CommTech and digital infrastructure, video-conferencing, and future roles for communication professionals. Results of a survey in 46 countries

Ziegele, Daniel & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Stress resilience: researching a key competence for professionals in communication management

25(4) , s. 335- 352. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0142 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Purpose Nowadays, communication practitioners are well-equipped with all kinds of skills and competencies. Nevertheless, those capabilities seem not to prevent professionals from stress and burnout. Stress resilience, i.e. the ability to deal with high demands at work, to cope with and recover from stress, seems to be a missing competence. This study sheds light on this important, but barely discussed aspect of communication management. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was applied to understand sources of stress and to identify opportunities to build stress resilience competence. Therefore, 40 in-depth interviews with senior leaders and young professionals in 30 agencies in the largest countries on two continents were conducted (United States vs Germany). Findings This study revealed common and threat drivers of stress. Overall, the work environment can be summarised as highly demanding and multifaceted, where stress resilience might be a useful competence to have to be successful and to be protected against negative stress outcomes such as burnout. The study identifies several reasons why resilient professionals are more successful in coping with stress. It is further shown that most communication agencies in the sample have already implemented programmes to increase employees' resilience.riginality/value This study offers an alternative view on the much-debated future of work by using an interdisciplinary approach and large-scale, qualitative insights from the agency environment. A novel concept is introduced that can stimulate further research.

Einwiller, Sabine; Sackmann, Sonja & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Handbuch Mitarbeiterkommunikation: Interne Kommunikation in Unternehmen

Zerfass, Ansgar; Chen, Xianhong, Hung-Baesecke, Flora, Tench, Ralph, Verčič, Dejan, Moreno, Angeles & Verhoeven, Piet (2021)

卓越传播: 全球战略传播与公共关系。北京: 中国传媒大学出版社

Communication excellence – How to manage strategic communication and public relations in a global world

Hagelstein, Jens; Einwiller, Sabine & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

The ethical dimension of public relations in Europe: Digital channels, moral challenges, resources, and training

47(4) Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102063 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Digital communication tools and practices improve the spread and impact of organisational messages. Quite often, however, they also pose moral problems. This article examines how often public relations practitioners encounter moral issues in their day-to-day work, how they assess digital communication tools and practices in terms of ethics, and the resources on which they rely to tackle moral challenges. Four research questions were addressed in an online survey among 2,324 practitioners who work in PR departments of organisations or in PR agencies across Europe. Results show that PR practitioners face more moral challenges in their daily work than they have faced in the past. Regarding digital communication tools and practices, they report moral concerns especially related to using bots, exploiting personal data for big-data analyses, paying social media influencers, and using sponsored content. Personal values and beliefs are the most important resource for dealing with moral issues—whether because only a minority of practitioners has participated in any formal ethics training within the past three years, or because existing ethical guidelines are outdated. Results call for the development of ethical guidelines that can provide explicit advice in the area of digital communication. Furthermore, structured training programs and ethics courses in graduate programs are needed to enhance practitioners’ ethical knowledge.

Macnamara, Jim; Lwin, May O., Hung-Baesecke, Flora & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor 2020/21. Strategic issues, competency development, ethical challenges and gender equality in the communications profession. Results of a survey in 15 countries and territories

Dühring, Lisa & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

The Triple Role of Communications in Agile Organizations

15(2) , s. 93- 112. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1887875 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

This study presents the findings of multi-method research that explores the challenges and implications of the concept of agility for the field of strategic communication. Despite its omnipresence in business practice, research on agility in the domain of strategic communication is scarce. Thus, a four-step research process was conducted to link the interdisciplinary debate about agility to the field of strategic communication. First, a systematic literature review across various disciplines provided a comprehensive understanding of agility and its key dimensions. Second, several conceptual frameworks for agility were analyzed and the relevant aspects for strategic communication were synthesized. In the third step, the current impact of organizational agility on corporate communications was explored by conducting empirical in-depth interviews with chief communication officers and senior communication managers from 38 multinational companies. Finally, the theoretical, conceptual, and empirical insights were combined to develop a framework for the role of strategic communication in the context of organizational agility. The findings of this study suggest that communication departments need to: a) adopt their own structures and processes, accordingly; b) enhance organizational agility by enabling other departments; and c) communicate the agile transformation of their organization both internally and externally.

Macnamara, Jim; Lwin, May O., Hung-Baesecke, Flora & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Communication practice trends in Asia-Pacific: Focus on new technologies, but concerns about trust and ethics

4(2) , s. 1- 13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14456/cmap.2021.6

Röttger, Ulrike; Donges, Patrick & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Handbuch Public Affairs: Politische Kommunikation für Unternehmen und Organisationen

Röttger, Ulrike; Donges, Patrick & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Public Affairs: Strategische Kommunikation an der Schnittstelle von Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft

, s. 3- 25.

Ehrhart, Christof & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

Strategien von Public Affairs in Unternehmen: Herausforderungen und Chancen in Zeiten des wirtschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Wandels

, s. 333- 346.

Holtzhausen, Derina R. & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

战略传播手册。北京:中国传媒大学出版社

Handbook of strategic communication

Meng, Juan; Reber, Bryan, Berger, Bruce, Gower, Karla & Zerfass, Ansgar (2021)

North American Communication Monitor 2020-2021. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic, ethical challenges, gender issues, cybersecurity, and competence gaps in strategic communication

Rolke, Lothar; Buhmann, Alexander & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

Evaluation und Controlling der Unternehmenskommunikation

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03894-6_27-1 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Kommunikationsmanager wissen heute um die Wirkung ihrer Arbeit und umihren Beitrag zur Erreichung von Unternehmenszielen. Dabei handelt es sich umLeistungen für eine gute Berichterstattung in den Medien, für die Reputation desUnternehmens und mitunter sogar für die direkte Verkaufsförderung, für dieMitarbeitermotivation genauso wie für die Gewinnung von Nachwuchskräften.Allerdings beruht dieses Wissen allzu oft auf Intuition, auf besonderen Erfahrun-gen wie im Falle von Krisen oder auf vereinzelten Erfolgsmessungen. Was häufigfehlt, ist ein institutionalisiertes Controlling der Unternehmenskommunikation,mit der die Steuerung und Evaluation der Kommunikationsprozesse systematisch

Zerfass, Ansgar; Piwinger, Manfred & Röttger, Ulrike (2020)

Handbuch Unternehmenskommunikation

Zerfass, Ansgar; Hagelstein, Jens & Tench, Ralph (2020)

Artificial intelligence in communication management: a cross-national study on adoption and knowledge, impact, challenges and risks

24(4) , s. 377- 389. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-10-2019-0137 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) might change the communication profession immensely, but the academic discourse is lacking an investigation of the perspective of practitioners on this. This article addresses this research gap. It offers a literature overview and reports about an empirical study on AI in communications, presenting first insights on how professionals in the field assess the technology. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative cross-national study among 2,689 European communication practitioners investigated four research questions: RQ1 – How much do professionals know about AI and to what extent are they already using AI technologies in their everyday lives? RQ2 – How do professionals rate the impact of AI on communication management? RQ3 – Which challenges do professionals identify for implementing AI in communication management? RQ4 – Which risks do they perceive? Findings Communication professionals revealed a limited understanding of AI and expected the technology to impact the profession as a whole more than the way their organisations or themselves work. Lack of individual competencies and organisations struggling with different levels of competency and unclear responsibilities were identified as key challenges and risks. Research limitations/implications The results highlight the need for communication managers to educate themselves and their teams about the technology and to identify the implementation of AI as a leadership issue. Originality/value The article offers the first cross-national quantitative study on AI in communication management. It presents valuable empirical insights on a trending topic in the discipline, highly relevant for both academics and practitioners.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Volk, Sophia Charlotte (2020)

Aligning and linking communication with organizational goals

, s. 417- 435.

Volk, Sophia Charlotte & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

Management tools in corporate communication: a survey about tool use and reflections about the gap between theory and practice

25(1) , s. 50- 67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-02-2020-0011 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Purpose The purpose of this article is to introduce the research field of management tools to communication management scholarship and open up new avenues for the field. Design/methodology/approach The first part examines established knowledge from the strategic management literature about management tools as a means to support and facilitate organizational decision-making. The second part reports on a survey among 125 communication practitioners in corporate communication departments about the use of 32 tools for the analysis, planning, implementation and evaluation of communication. Findings The study sheds light on the perceived relevance and benefits of tools, as well as on knowledge and satisfaction and on general patterns of tool use. The findings demonstrate that tools are gaining in importance, but there is a lack of understanding, training and documentation of tools. Tools for planning and implementing communication are most widely spread, reflecting the operational focus of corporate communication. Practical implications Practitioners find value in the compilation of the most popular tools and implications on how to reflect about tool usage and outcomes. Originality/value The article provides directions for future research and reflects about tools as a means to bridge the divide between theory and practice.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verhoeven, Piet, Moreno, Angeles, Tench, Ralph & Verčič, Dejan (2020)

European Communication Monitor 2020. Ethical challenges, gender issues, cyber security, and competence gaps in strategic communication. Results of survey in 44 countries

Röttger, Ulrike; Donges, Patrick & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

Handbuch Public Affairs: Politische Kommunikation für Unternehmen und Organisationen

Einwiller, Sabine; Sackmann, Sonja & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

Handbuch Mitarbeiterkommunikation: Interne Kommunikation in Unternehmen

Keller-Bacher, Jule & Zerfass, Ansgar (2019)

How strategic communication facilitates the internationalization of firms: A situational framework

, s. 1- 21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-391420190000004002 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

This chapter examines the specific role of strategic communication as a facilitator for business internationalization. It provides a new and comprehensive rationale for explaining the contribution of strategic communication to the global success of companies and shows communication leaders how they could demonstrate the value of communication for internationalization. The chapter identifies an important contribution of strategic communication in today’s globalized world, which demands further attention in academia and in practice by addressing three research questions: (1) How can strategic communication be conceptualized as part of the internationalization of firms? (2) Which specific objectives, responsibilities and practices can be assigned to strategic communication within the process of internationalization? (3) Does the theoretical framework capture the significant components of strategic communication within internationalization, appropriately from the point of view of senior experts in the field? The chosen approach is conceptual and empirical. A cross-disciplinary literature analysis has been performed to construct a framework that links possible forms and manifestations of strategic communication to different situations of international business development. Qualitative interviews with senior communication executives were conducted to verify the plausibility of the theoretical framework from a professional point of view. The study identifies four core fields of strategic communication within the internationalization processes: initiation, transformation, expansion and integration. Communication should be implemented differently within the typical periods of internationalization, and communication management should focus on different aspects during these processes. Empirical findings indicate that the core fields depicted in the framework are either already applied in practice or perceived as plausible and doable. From a theoretical standpoint, this study emphasizes the value of a cross-disciplinary perspective on corporate communications, which helps to bridge gaps between management research and communication studies. The study expands the body of knowledge in strategic communication by integrating new objectives and activities.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Volk, Sophia Charlotte (2019)

Toolbox Kommunikationsmanagement: Denkwerkzeuge und Methoden für die Steuerung der Unternehmenskommunikation

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verčič, Dejan, Verhoeven, Piet, Moreno, Angeles & Tench, Ralph (2019)

European Communication Monitor 2019. Exploring trust in the profession, transparency, artificial intelligence and new content strategies. Results of a survey in 46 countries

Nothhaft, Howard; Werder, Kelly Page, Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2019)

Strategic communication: Reflections on an elusive concept

, s. 24- 38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1492412 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

The article explores how strategic communication successfully established itself as an academic discipline despite (or perhaps because of) being centered on an elusive concept. Drawing on ideas about the evolution of academic disciplines proposed by Alexander M. Shneider, we argue that strategic communication is currently caught in a cycle of constant reinvention obscured by a discourse of emergence. Although the discipline is undoubtedly becoming more sophisticated, it is doubtful whether there is genuine progress. The authors examine facets of strategic communication that contribute to the current state of affairs. Although clearer conceptualization and a more realistic understanding of the discipline are identified as a prerequisite for maturation, progress—as opposed to sophistication—ultimately depends on the development of discipline-specific, unique, and robust methods.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verčič, Dejan, Nothhaft, Howard & Werder, Kelly Page (2019)

Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice

, s. 159- 177. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1493485 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

This article draws on a decade of research in strategic communication and especially on the contributions in this special issue to propose a new and more comprehensive definition of strategic communication. We argue that strategic communication encompasses all communication that is substantial for the survival and sustained success of an entity. Specifically, strategic communication is the purposeful use of communication by an entity to engage in conversations of strategic significance to its goals. Entity includes all kind of organizations (e.g., corporations, governments, or nonprofits), as well as social movements and known individuals in the public sphere. Communication can play a distinctive role for the formulation, revision, presentation, execution, implementation, and operationalization of strategies. While there are many ways to investigate these research objects, strategic communication as a discipline takes the perspective of the focal organization/entity and its calculus to achieve specific goals by means of communication under conditions of limited resources and uncertainty. The article takes a critical look at the current state of the field and outlines several requirements that will help scholars and practitioners alike to build a unique body of knowledge in strategic communication.

Nothhaft, Howard; Werder, Kelly Page, Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2019)

Future directions of strategic communication

Werder, Kelly Page; Nothhaft, Howard, Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2019)

Strategic communication as an emerging interdisciplinary paradigm

, s. 5- 23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1494181 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

This study explores future directions in strategic communication scholarship by examining the emergence of strategic communication through the lens of interdisciplinary science. The disciplinary status of strategic communication is described through a content analysis of manuscripts published in the International Journal of Strategic Communication since its inaugural issue in 2007 (N = 207). Results reveal positive trends in research productivity, authorship, and globalization of the discipline over an 11-year period. However, analysis of the methodological and theoretical attributes of strategic communication scholarship suggests that more interdisciplinary research is needed. This study proposes definitional refinements that may strengthen the consistency of purpose among strategic communication scholars for future research and theory building. In addition, this study proposes that scholars embrace an interdisciplinary worldview to further the development of strategic communication as a unique and innovative domain of study in the future.

Buhmann, Alexander; Macnamara, Jim & Zerfass, Ansgar (2019)

Reviewing the ‘march to standards’ in public relations: a comparative analysis of four seminal measurement and evaluation initiatives

45(4) Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101825 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

To many, development and adoption of professional standards for measurement and evaluation (M&E) is one of the most promising approaches for advancing public relations practice. In recent years, there has been a surge in efforts to develop standards for M&E in different parts of the world. Prominent examples of this include standard terminologies, metrics, principles for best practice in the field, and evaluation frameworks. Regardless of their alleged importance, however, the acceptance and application of such M&E standards in the practice varies significantly. To better understand the process by which standards in this field are developed and adopted, this article draws on recent concepts from organization studies (cf. Slager, Gond, & Moon, 2012) to analyze the trajectories of four seminal standards attempts: The Barcelona Principles and the AMEC Integrated Evaluation Framework on an international level, the DPRG/ICV Framework used in German-speaking countries, and the GCS Framework in the United Kingdom. The article reveals, by way of an interpretive qualitative approach, the various strategies undertaken to a) develop common sets of terms and rules, b) engage relevant actors in the design, promotion, and implementation of proposed standards, and c) to reinforcing standards symbolically.

Navarro, Cristina; Moreno, Angeles & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Mastering the dialogic tools: Social media use and perceptions of public relations practitioners in Latin America

22(1) , s. 28- 45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-12-2016-0095

Verhoeven, Piet; Zerfass, Ansgar, Verčič, Dejan, Moreno, Angeles & Tench, Ralph (2018)

Public relations and the rise of hypermodern values: Exploring the profession in Europe

44(4) , s. 4171- 480. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.06.001

Macnamara, Jim; Zerfass, Ansgar, Adi, Ana & Lwin, May O. (2018)

Capabilities of PR professionals for key activities lag: Asia-Pacific study shows theory and practice gaps

44(5) , s. 704- 716. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.010

Macnamara, Jim; Zerfass, Ansgar, Lwin, May O. & Adi, Ana (2018)

PR and communication management in Asia-Pacific: Trends, growth and gaps.

1(1) , s. 1- 16.

Schneider, Lena & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Polyphony in corporate and organizational communications: Exploring the roots and characteristics of a new paradigm.

3(2) , s. 6- 29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22522/cmr20180232

Werder, Kelly Page; Nothhaft, Howard, Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Strategic Communication as an Emerging Interdisciplinary Paradigm

12(4) , s. 333- 351. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1494181

This study explores future directions in strategic communication scholarship by examining the emergence of strategic communication through the lens of interdisciplinary science. The disciplinary status of strategic communication is described through a content analysis of manuscripts published in the International Journal of Strategic Communication since its inaugural issue in 2007 (N = 207). Results reveal positive trends in research productivity, authorship, and globalization of the discipline over an 11-year period. However, analysis of the methodological and theoretical attributes of strategic communication scholarship suggests that more interdisciplinary research is needed. This study proposes definitional refinements that may strengthen the consistency of purpose among strategic communication scholars for future research and theory building. In addition, this study proposes that scholars embrace an interdisciplinary worldview to further the development of strategic communication as a unique and innovative domain of study in the future.

Volk, Sophia Charlotte & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Alignment: Explicating a Key Concept in Strategic Communication

12(4) , s. 433- 451. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452742

This article seeks to build a better understanding of the concept of alignment, which has been acknowledged as a central aspect of strategic communication, but never explicitly defined. Building upon a comprehensive literature review and systematization of concepts at the nexus of strategic communication and management research, a working definition and an integrative conceptual framework of alignment of strategic communication are suggested. The new definition describes alignment of strategic communication both as an outcome and an ongoing process and introduces a distinction between primary and secondary alignment. The new framework combines the multiple perspectives and types of alignment discussed so far, differentiating between external and internal alignment, intrafunctional and cross-functional alignment, management–strategy–activities alignment and process–structure–culture–people alignment. Six avenues for future conceptual, empirical, and critical research are pointed out to provide inspiration for strategic communication scholars to carry forward research of the alignment concept.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verčič, Dejan, Nothhaft, Howard & Werder, Kelly Page (2018)

Strategic Communication: Defining the Field and its Contribution to Research and Practice

12(4) , s. 487- 505. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485

This article draws on a decade of research in strategic communication and especially on the contributions in this special issue to propose a new and more comprehensive definition of strategic communication. We argue that strategic communication encompasses all communication that is substantial for the survival and sustained success of an entity. Specifically, strategic communication is the purposeful use of communication by an entity to engage in conversations of strategic significance to its goals. Entity includes all kind of organizations (e.g., corporations, governments, or nonprofits), as well as social movements and known individuals in the public sphere. Communication can play a distinctive role for the formulation, revision, presentation, execution, implementation, and operationalization of strategies. While there are many ways to investigate these research objects, strategic communication as a discipline takes the perspective of the focal organization/entity and its calculus to achieve specific goals by means of communication under conditions of limited resources and uncertainty. The article takes a critical look at the current state of the field and outlines several requirements that will help scholars and practitioners alike to build a unique body of knowledge in strategic communication.

Nothhaft, Howard; Werder, Kelly Page, Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Strategic Communication: Reflections on an Elusive Concept

12(4) , s. 352- 366. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1492412

The article explores how strategic communication successfully established itself as an academic discipline despite (or perhaps because of) being centered on an elusive concept. Drawing on ideas about the evolution of academic disciplines proposed by Alexander M. Shneider, we argue that strategic communication is currently caught in a cycle of constant reinvention obscured by a discourse of emergence. Although the discipline is undoubtedly becoming more sophisticated, it is doubtful whether there is genuine progress. The authors examine facets of strategic communication that contribute to the current state of affairs. Although clearer conceptualization and a more realistic understanding of the discipline are identified as a prerequisite for maturation, progress—as opposed to sophistication—ultimately depends on the development of discipline-specific, unique, and robust methods.

Borner, Maria & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

The power of listening in corporate communications: Theoretical foundations of corporate listening as a strategic mode of communication.

, s. 3- 22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/s2398-391420180000003001

Zerfass, Ansgar & Volk, Sophia Charlotte (2018)

Communication Management

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0244

Zerfass, Ansgar & Volk, Sophia Charlotte (2018)

How communication departments contribute to corporate success: The communications contributions framework

22(4) , s. 397- 415. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-12-2017-0146

Zerfass, Ansgar; Tench, Ralph, Verhoeven, Piet, Verčič, Dejan & Moreno, Angeles (2018)

European Communication Monitor 2018. Strategic communication and the challenges of fake news, trust, leadership, work stress and job satisfaction. Results of a survey in 48 Countries.

Wolf, Cornelia & Zerfass, Ansgar (2017)

Mobile Corporate Communication – Potentials and Contemporary Practices

, s. 67- 75.

Tench, Ralph; Verčič, Dejan, Zerfass, Ansgar, Moreno, Angeles & Verhoeven, Piet (2017)

Communication Excellence - How to Develop, Manage and Lead Exceptional Communications

Zerfass, Ansgar; Moreno, Angeles, Tench, Ralph, Verčič, Dejan & Verhoeven, Piet (2017)

European Communication Monitor 2017. How strategic communication deals with the challenges of visualisation, social bots and hypermodernity. Results of a survey in 50 Countries.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Bentele, Günter, Schwalbach, Joachim & Sherzada, Muschda (2017)

Unternehmenskommunikation aus der Perspektive von Top-Managern und Kommunikatoren: Ein Vergleich

, s. 197- 221. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18455-1_9

Winkler, Luisa; Volk, Sophia Charlotte, Borner, Maria & Zerfass, Ansgar (2017)

Zwischen Intention und Emergenz: Mittelstandskommunikation im Spannungsfeld kontroverser Strategieparadigmen

, s. 215- 232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17634-1_12

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verčič, Dejan & Volk, Sophia Charlotte (2017)

Communication evaluation and measurement. Skills, practices and utilization in European organizations

22(1) , s. 2- 18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2016-0056 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the status quo of communication evaluation and measurement practices in communication departments of companies, non-profits, and other organizations across Europe. Design/methodology/approach: The study argues that the challenge to conduct reliable measurement is threefold: first, communication professionals have to understand and develop skills how to conduct evaluation; second, they have to evaluate whether communication activities have reached those goals in practice; and finally, they have to use those insights to advance and manage their future activities. These aspects are elaborated in the literature review. A quantitative survey of 1,601 professionals from 40 European countries was conducted to research prerequisites, implementation and benefits of communication measurement and compare practices across types of organizations. Findings: Although robust knowledge of empirical research methods and their application for measuring communication effects is indispensable, many practitioners lack the necessary expertise to conduct reliable evaluation and measurement. Communication departments seldom measure communication effects on stakeholders and organizational goals. Many remain focused on media and channels. Last but not least, organizations do not fully exploit the potential of measurement data for strategically planning future communication activities. Practical implicatio: The findings highlight the need to reconsider current education and training in communication research methods and their application in corporate practice. Knowledge about conducting applied research is as important as asking meaningful questions and using insights for management decisions in a corporate environment. Evaluation methods are often discussed, but individual skills and the organizational use of insights are important as well. This might be tackled through additional training in social science research techniques, sophisticated valuation methods, and decision making. Originality/value: The large-scale study shows that communication measurement practices are still in a nascent stage. Joint efforts of academics and professional associations have not really changed the situation until now. The three dimensions used in this research (skills, practices, and utilization) can be used to assess the measurement readiness of individual organizations, to conduct further research in other regions, and to identify future challenges for advancing the field.

Wiesenberg, Markus; Zerfass, Ansgar & Moreno, Angeles (2017)

Big Data and Automation in Strategic Communication

11(2) , s. 95- 114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2017.1285770 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Big data and automation pose huge challenges for strategic communication. This article contributes to the limited body of knowledge in the field by introducing the concepts, outlining opportunities and potential problems, and identifying current perceptions and applications in the professional field. A large-scale survey, with respondents from across more than 40 countries, explores the expertise of communication professionals, applications within communication departments and agencies, and consequences for the profession at large. The study shows a large gap between the perceived importance and current practices, a lack of competencies and ethical reflection, and a limited use of opportunities. The full potential of big data analytics and algorithms has not been leveraged until now, which calls for new initiatives in the practice and further research.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Macnamara, Jim (2017)

Evaluation stasis continues in PR and corporate communication: Asia Pacific insights into causes.

3(4) , s. 319- 334. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2017.1275258 - Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

The first comprehensive study of public relations (PR) and corporate communication practices across Asia-Pacific countries has found that, despite being an area of rapid growth, evaluation remains limited, is often not based on reliable research methods, and is focussed on outputs rather than the outcomes of communication. This reflects a worldwide stasis in evaluation of PR that has been identified as problematic by a number of authors. The Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor, a survey-based study conducted by a collaboration of 16 universities across 23 Asia-Pacific countries in 2015, also explored practitioners’ skills, and found a significant lag that could account for this stasis. This article reports key findings of this study that contribute insights to address the lack of measurement and evaluation in the growing field of PR that remains a major concern in the academy and industry.

Brønn, Peggy Simcic; Romenti, Stefania & Zerfass, Ansgar (2016)

The Management Game of Communication

Zerfass, Ansgar & Wiesenberg, Markus (2016)

Communicating the leadership status of organisations. A cross-national study in 10 European countries

, s. 121- 142. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/s2398-391420160000001007

Krebber, Felix; Biederstaedt, Christian & Zerfass, Ansgar (2016)

Online campaigning and offline lobbying: Public Affairs Strategies of Greenpeace Germany

, s. 1ß3- 12ß.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Winkler, Luisa (2016)

Corporate communication in SMEs. Unveiling an ignored field of practice

, s. 265- 286. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/s2398-391420160000001014

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verhoeven, Piet, Moreno, Angeles, Tench, Ralph & Verčič, Dejan (2016)

European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring trends in big data, stakeholder engagement and strategic communication. Results of a Survey in 43 Countries.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verčič, Dejan & Wiesenberg, Markus (2016)

The dawn of a new golden age for media relations?: How PR professionals interact with the mass media and use new collaboration practices

42(4) , s. 499- 508. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.005

The article reviews the status of media relations in Europe while it reflects the upcoming media shift from mass mediated communication to own produced and delivered content by strategic communicators. The literature review echoes the changing media landscape from the PR practitioner’s point of view: Whereas the 20th century gave birth to different kind of media relations, the highly networked and fluid ways of content re-production, dissemination and therefore the co-construction of meaning became much more important for all kinds of organizations and their public relations practitioners as well as marketeers. Referring to these new forms of mediatized content, the final section of the literature review introduces the concept of strategic mediatization as a new practice supplementing and/or replacing old media relations. Based on the theoretical ground stressed out in the literature review, an empirical study was carried out based on a quantitative survey among 2,253 communication practitioners across Europe. The survey results emphasize a strong shift from the prevalence of mass media to owned media especially in Western and Northern Europe. However, the rising importance of new content practices is considered important in all European regions alike. Nevertheless, the study identifies large gaps between the considered importance and the usage of these new media relations practices.

Falkheimer, Jesper; Heide, Mats, Simonsson, Charlotte, Zerfass, Ansgar & Verhoeven, Piet (2016)

Doing the right things or doing things right?: Paradoxes and Swedish communication professionals’ roles and challenges

21(2) , s. 142- 159. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-06-2015-0037

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine and analyze the prevailing form of rationality that governs the challenges, goals and roles of communication professionals. The authors will also explore alternative forms of rationality and discuss what these would imply. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on survey results from The European Communication Monitor (ECM) and qualitative interviews with communication managers in Sweden. First, the authors present the ECM data and the Swedish interview material, i.e. the authors depict the practitioners’ perceptions of what they understand as important work tasks and roles. The interviews focus on the actual practices of linking communication goals to business goals. Second, the results are challenged from a reflexive perspective, using theories from the paradox turn and questioning the “taken-for-granted thinking” in corporate communications. Findings – The ECM data show that the main challenge in practice is “linking business strategy and communication.” The Swedish respondents stand out when it comes to “building and maintaining trust” since this is considered to be almost as important. The qualitative interview study strengthens the results in the ECM. The interviewees seem to do their work according to the traditional management agenda – i.e. they break down overall business goals and translate these to measurable communication goals. The results are reflected upon using paradox theory. Two paradoxes are discussed: between managerialism and professionalism, and strategic generalists and operational specialists. Research limitations/implications – The study is based on survey data that have been collected through a convenience sample, and the interview study is a pilot study. Practical implications – The paper focuses conflicts between normative practitioner ideals and reality, and helps practitioners to reflect upon mainstream thinking. Originality/value – Based on the empirical findings in the ECM, the interviews and the theoretical framework, the authors conclude that if the idea of The Communicative Organization is to be fruitfully realized, it is necessary to depart from a multi-dimensional rationality and question ideas that are taken for granted. The use of paradox theory and concepts such as functional stupidity is rather original in corporate communication research. Additional research could further explore paradoxes in order to spark dialogue, which may undermine one-dimensional thinking and functional stupidity.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Verčič, Dejan & Wiesenberg, Markus (2016)

Managing CEO communication and positioning: A cross-national study among corporate communication leaders

20(1) , s. 37- 55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2014-0066

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the practices of positioning Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) and other top executives in the public sphere and approaches to manage their communication activities. Design/methodology/approach – A neo-institutional framework is used to explain the growth of CEO positioning in mediatisated societies. Research questions are derived from previous research and tested in a quantitative online survey with 512 heads of corporate communication in 21 countries across Europe and a qualitative survey with 42 communication leaders in 12 countries. Findings – The majority of companies position their CEOs and/or other top executives, but only a minority guide these activities through a sound management process. European CEOs are primarily presented based on their functional and ethical competencies. A minority of communication leaders prefer the uniform positioning of their CEOs in different markets; others argue for localised approaches. More companies in high-power distance countries have a specific communication strategy for their CEOs, compared to companies in low-power distance countries. Significant differences were also identified between listed and privately owned companies. Research limitations/implications – The study indicates the importance of CEO positioning from the perspective of corporate communication leaders. Investigating the expectations and experiences of CEOs themselves might provide additional insights. Originality/value – The paper presents the first large-scale study on CEO positioning, informs practitioners on the state of practice in Europe and identifies knowledge that can be integrated into education of business and communications students alike.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Viertmann, Christine (2016)

Multiple voices in corporations and the challenge for strategic communication

, s. 44- 63.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Vercic, Dejan, Verhoeven, Piet, Moreno, Angeles & Tench, Ralph (2015)

European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating communication value through listening, messaging and measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Pleil, Thomas (2015)

Handbuch Online-PR. Strategische Kommunikation in Internet und Social Web, 2. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage [Handbook online public relations. Strategic communication on the internet and social web. 2nd, revised and enlarged edition]

Kiesenbauer, Juliane; Burkert, Augustine & Zerfass, Ansgar (2015)

Mentoring in Public Relations: An International Study on Mentoring Programmes of Professional Associations

, s. 367- 390.

Oliveira, Evandro; Linke, Anne, Kunsch, Margarida Krohling & Zerfass, Ansgar (2015)

How global is the web 2.0 hype? A comparison of social media communication in Brazil, Germany and Portugal

, s. 391- 412. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.018

Catellani, Andrea; Zerfass, Ansgar & Tench, Ralph (2015)

Communication Ethics in a Connected World

Verčič, Dejan; Zerfass, Ansgar & Wiesenberg, Markus (2015)

Global public relations and communication management: A European perspective

41(5) , s. 785- 793. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.06.017

Zerfass, Ansgar & Sherzada, Muschda (2015)

Corporate communications from the CEO’s perspective: How top executives conceptualize and value strategic communication

20(3) , s. 291- 309. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014-0020

Moreno, Angeles; Navarro, Cristina, Tench, Ralph & Zerfass, Ansgar (2015)

Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe.

41(2) , s. 242- 253. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006

A key aspect for understanding and explaining online communication is the micro level of communication practitioners’ social media usage and their general attitudes towards digital platforms. This paper investigates how public relations practitioner's personal and professional use of social media is related to their perceptions of social media. A quantitative methodology was applied to perform this research. A population of 2710 professionals from 43 European countries working on different hierarchical levels both in communication departments and agencies across Europe were surveyed as part of a larger transnational online survey. Results show that practitioners with a high level of usage of social media give more importance to social media channels, influence of social media on internal and external stakeholders and relevance of key gatekeepers and stakeholders along with a better self-estimation of competences. Issues about diverse levels of overestimation of social media use, application and importance in the professional arena are also debated.

Kiesenbauer, Juliane & Zerfass, Ansgar (2015)

Today’s and tomorrow’s challenges in public relations: Comparing the views of chief communication officers and next generation leaders

41(4) , s. 422- 434. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.013

Most public relations research is focused on communication processes and the instruments, strategies and objectives in use. Less is known about the men and women who are and will be responsible for managing strategic communication in organizations today and tomorrow. Their understanding of strategic communication is crucial for the perception of the profession by different stakeholders and substantially influences the economic success and social acceptance of companies. This study takes a close look at leaders shaping the professional field now and in the future. Qualitative interviews with 20 chief communication officers and 20 future leaders (Generation Y) in the same companies were conducted. Comparing the views, experiences and expectations of the two age groups helps to identify cognitive patterns, routes of development in practice as well as new areas for research.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Schramm, Dana Melanie (2014)

Social Media Newsrooms in Public Relations. A conceptual framework and corporate practices in three countries

40(1) , s. 79- 91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.12.003

The rise of social media in organizational settings has opened up new horizons for strategic communication. However, there are also drawbacks. Arguably the most important one is increased complexity. Many communication departments use a multitude of platforms ranging from corporate websites, campaign microsites and blogs to services like Facebook, Twitter, and the like to communicate with stakeholders. Social Media Newsrooms (SMNRs) have been introduced as instruments to reduce this complexity. The basic idea is straightforward: SMNRs aggregate social media content provided by the organization and/or thematic content about the organization and its key issues from several platforms in one place. Although SMNRs have been used in public relations practice around the world since the concept was first introduced in 2007, empirical evidence is still missing. This paper closes the research gap by a) introducing SMNRs from a conceptual perspective based on a literature review, b) exploring opportunities and challenges for strategic communication, c) researching empirical manifestations and modes of usage by corporations in three major international markets (United States, United Kingdom, Germany) based on a comprehensive content analysis of the 600 largest companies and 2,045 2 affiliated brands and subsidiaries, and d) explaining implications for the practice of public relations.

Vercic, Dejan; Verhoeven, Piet & Zerfass, Ansgar (2014)

Key issues of public relations of Europe: Findings from the European Communication Monitor 2007-2014 (Temas clave de las relaciones públicas en Europa: Resultados del European Communication Monitor 2007-2014)

4(8) , s. 5- 26.

Moreno, Angeles; Verhoeven, Piet, Tench, Ralph & Zerfass, Ansgar (2014)

Increasing power and taking a lead - What are practitioners really doing? Empirical evidence from European communications managers (Incrementar el poder y asumir el liderazgo - ¿Qué hacen realmente los profesionales? Evidencias empíricas sobre los gestores de comunicación en Europa)

4(7) , s. 73- 94.

Holtzhausen, Derina R. & Zerfass, Ansgar (2014)

The Routledge handbook of strategic communication

Zerfass, Ansgar; Röttger, Ulrike & Stahl, Janne (2014)

Leadership in Communication Management: Enduring and Emerging Challenges in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

, s. 186- 200.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Linke, Anne & Röttger, Ulrike (2014)

Key Issues in the Field: The Context for Leadership

, s. 63- 79.

Zerfass, Ansgar; Schwalbach, Joachim, Bentele, Günter & Sherzada, Muschda (2014)

Corporate Communications from the Top and from the Center: Comparing Experiences and Expectations of CEOs and Communicators

8(2) , s. 61- 78. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.879146

Common viewpoints as well as divergences between top executives and communication professionals influence the institutionalization of strategic communication. However, there is little empirical evidence on the accordance between both groups. Most research explores either communication professionals or chief communication officers (CCOs). Very few studies have combined both perspectives. This article identifies the research gap, explores insights from previous research, and contributes to the body of knowledge in strategic communication with an original study that is based on two surveys with replies from 602 CEOs and executive board members as well as 1,251 communication managers from companies in the largest European country, Germany. While top executives rate the information and motivation of employees as the most important objective of corporate communication, communication professionals focus on the creation of a positive image. Respondents from both groups also state different opinions about dealing with the demand for transparency. Both top executives and communicators give most support to a role model that describes communication professionals as a facilitator between an organization and its publics. Nevertheless the overall conclusion is that perspectives diverge quite often and attention should be directed towards a better alignment between top management and those leading the strategic communication function.

Holtzhausen, Derina R. & Zerfass, Ansgar (2014)

Strategic Communication: Opportunities and Challenges of the Research Area

, s. 3- 17.

Holtzhausen, Derina R. & Zerfass, Ansgar (2014)

Routledge Handbook of Strategic Communication

Zerfass, Ansgar; Tench, Ralph, Vercic, Dejan, Verhoeven, Piet & Moreno, Angeles (2014)

European Communication Monitor 2014. Excellence in Strategic Communication – Key Issues, Leadership, Gender and Mobile Media. Results of a Survey in 42 Countries

Zerfass, Ansgar; Rademacher, Lars & Wehmeier, Stefan (2013)

Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations: Forschungsparadigmen und neue Perspektiven

Zerfass, Ansgar & Franke, Neele (2013)

Enabling, Advising, Supporting, Executing: A Theoretical Framework for Internal Communication Consulting Within Organizations

7(2) , s. 118- 135. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.765438

This article analyzes the consulting and enabling function within the role set of communication managers and provides an initial theoretical framework for internal communication consulting in organizations. The idea of communication professionals as consultants has already been introduced by a number of researchers. Nevertheless, the necessity of this task as well as the specific dimensions and practices of internal communication consulting have not been elaborated until now. This article takes an initial step towards closing this gap by developing a new framework. After a short introduction, the necessity of the consulting function will be emphasized by introducing the concept of the communicative organization. In order to fulfill this requirement, communicative competencies in a much broader sense have to be developed. This leads to a new challenge for communication professionals: they are asked to advise organizational members and to enable them to resolve communication-related issues as well as task-related issues. Based on a research review, a framework for internal communication consulting has been constructed by combining the dimensions of consulting forms and objectives. Qualitative interviews with communication executives have been conducted to verify the plausibility of this framework. The article closes by outlining implications for research, education, and practice.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Müller, Maren Christin (2013)

Stakeholderbeziehungen in der CSR-Kommunikation. Empirische Studie zu Strategien und Rahmenbedingungen in deutschen Unternehmen

20(1) , s. 51- 57. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-013-0267-2

Sriramesh, Krishnamurthy; Zerfass, Ansgar & Jeong-Nam, Kim (2013)

Public relations and communication management: current trends and emerging topics

Holtzhausen, Derina R. & Zerfass, Ansgar (2013)

Strategic communication: Pillars and perspectives of an alternative paradigm

, s. 283- 302. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18961-1_4

Zerfass, Ansgar; Moreno, Angeles, Tench, Ralph, Vercic, Dejan & Verhoeven, Piet (2013)

European Communication Monitor 2013. A Changing Landscape - Managing Crises, Digital Communication and CEO Positioning in Europe. Results of a Survey in 43 Countries

Nothhaft, Howard; Werder, Kelly Page, Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Editors' Introduction

[Kronikk]

Zerfass, Ansgar; Tench, Ralph, Verčič, Dejan, Moreno, Angeles, Buhmann, Alexander & Hagelstein, Jens (2023)

European Communication Monitor 2023. Looking back and ahead: 15 years of research on strategic communication

[Report Research].

Zerfass, Ansgar & Link, Jeanne (2022)

Communication management: structures, processes, and business models for value creation through corporate communications

Zerfass, Ansgar & Link, Jeanne (red.). Communication management: structures, processes, and business models for value creation through corporate communications

Johansen, Winni; Frandsen, Finn, Buhmann, Alexander, Luoma-aho, Vilma, Falkheimer, Jesper & Zerfass, Ansgar (2022)

The Nordic Communications Report 2022

[Report Research].

Buhmann, Alexander; Reiby, Kateryna Maltseva, Tam, Lisa & Zerfass, Ansgar (2022)

The Use and Adoption of Videoconferencing in Stakeholder Communications

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Zerfass, Ansgar; Moreno, Angeles, Tench, Ralph, Verčič, Dejan & Buhmann, Alexander (2022)

European Communication Monitor 2022. Exploring diversity and empathic leadership, CommTech and consulting in communications. Results of a survey in 43 countries.

[Report Research].

Buhmann, Alexander; Linke, Jeanne, Frandsen, Finn, Zerfass, Ansgar, Luoma-aho, Vilma & Falkheimer, Jesper (2021)

The Nordic communications report 2021. Current and future trends in Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden

[Report Research].

Ziegele, Daniel & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

Stress resilience: A key competence for professionals in public relations

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Jagdhuhn, Maria & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

From talking to listening – the neglected mode of corporate communication

[Popular Science Article]. 7(1) , s. 8- 9.

Nobell, Alejandro Alvarez; Moreno, Angeles, Zerfass, Ansgar & Sadi, Gabriel (2020)

Los professionales de las relaciones públicas en el LATAM. Análisis compartido y evolutivo de los perfiles, la formación y los ámbitos de desempeno a partir del Latin Commucciation Monitor (2014-2019)

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Hagelstein, Jens; Einwiller, Sabine & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

The ethical dimension of communication management in Europe: New channels, challenges, resources and training

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Verčič, Dejan & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

New realities of public relations and cyber security

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Hagelstein, Jens & Zerfass, Ansgar (2020)

Dancing with the devil? The adoption of paid media among PR professionals

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Meng, Juan; Reber, Bryan, Berger, Bruce, Gower, Karla & Zerfass, Ansgar (2019)

North American Communication Monitor 2018-2019. Tracking trends in fake news, issues management, leadership performance, work stress, social media skills, job satisfaction and work environment

[Report Research].

Buhmann, Alexander & Zerfass, Ansgar (2018)

Understanding the dynamics of (non)standardization in communication measurement and evaluation

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Zerfass, Ansgar; Volk, Sophia Charlotte, Lautenbach, Christoph & Jakubowitz, Melanie (2018)

Management tools for corporate communications – Relevance, benefits and experiences. Results of an empirical study in communication departments.

[Report Research].

Macnamara, Jim; Lwin, May O., Adi, Ana & Zerfass, Ansgar (2017)

Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor 2017/18. Strategic challenges, social media and professional capabilties – Results of a survey in 22 countries

[Report Research].

Zerfass, Ansgar & Piwinger, Manfred (2014)

Handbuch Unternehmenskommunikation (Handbook of Corporate Communications)

[Encyclopedia].

Zerfass, Ansgar & Sherzada, Muschda (2014)

Corporate communications from the CEO’s perspective: How top executives conceptualize and value strategic communication

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Zerfass, Ansgar & Koehler, Kristin (2013)

International Strategic Communication with Investors on the Web – A Global Benchmark Study of Financial Communications in the US, UK, France, Germany and Japan

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Zerfass, Ansgar; Schwalbach, Joachim, Bentele, Günter & Sherzada, Muschda (2013)

Corporate Communications from the Top and from the Centre: Comparing Experiences and Expectations of CEOs and Communicators

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Vercic, Dejan; Moreno, Angeles & Zerfass, Ansgar (2013)

Communicative Assets

[Popular Science Article]. 9(3) , s. 22- 27.

Zerfass, Ansgar & Schramm, Dana Melanie (2013)

Social Media Newsrooms in Public Relations: Developing a conceptual framework and researching corporate practices in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany

[Conference Lecture]. Event

Akademisk grad
År Akademisk institusjon Grad
2006 University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Ph.D.
1996 University of Erlangen-Nuremberg - Dr. rer. pol. PhD
1990 University of Erlangen-Nuremberg - Dipl.-Kfm. (Univ.) Other
Arbeidserfaring
År Arbeidsgiver Tittel
2014 - Present Leipzig University Professor Chair
2013 - Present BI Norwegian Business School Adjunct professor
2006 - 2014 Leipzig University Professor