Psychometrika
p. 32-32
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1017/psy.2026.10135
Mean and sum scores are widely used in psychometric practice, but their behavior under weak assumptions is not fully understood. We study two basic questions under a latent variable framework with increasing-item asymptotics: when does the observed mean score approximate the true score of the administered form, and when is a true score insensitive to removing a vanishing fraction of items? For the first question, we introduce martingale factor models, which, for polytomous items, weaken conditional independence to a conditional-mean restriction, yet still yield concentration and asymptotic normality results for mean scores around their true scores. For the second question, we show that this stability is equivalent to the convergence of the true scores when the items are bounded, and we identify conditions under which this convergence takes place. These results clarify when mean scores can be interpreted as stable proxies for latent variables, and yield psychometrically relevant consequences. Several theoretical and numerical illustrations are given, including a new interpretation of large-form mean-score correlations and a person-specific confidence interval procedure for the true score.